On September 23, 2023 6:48:59 PM GMT+03:00, rhatto via nettime-l <[email protected]> wrote: >Hello nettimers, this might be of interest: > > Copy Far "AI" - A license close to copyleft, but far from the so-called > "Artificial Intelligences": https://copyfarai.itcouldbewor.se > >ps: I'm not in the list (please Cc).
"[...]cannot be used for procedures known as "machine learning" and stylometric analysist[...]" https://copyfarai.itcouldbewor.se/ for proprietary ones, it could be a nice strategy/statement, but how about floss and even copyleft floss ones? what if the model is/will be released under a copyleft license? who would benefit more from limiting the use for training copyleft floss uses as well? i don't know if it is legally possible to enforce the output of copyleft ai tools to be copyleft as well. say, enforcing a program output from a copyleft ai system to be released as copyleft. even if the copyleft method wouldn't be possible legally and technically for ai situations, isn't it a good.idea to support / encourage the development of floss models over proprietary ones through the statements as in this one? -- özgür k. gpg:A3E6 57AD E14D 1F66 A546 6101 BA42 0724 E750 C5AE -- # distributed via <nettime>: no commercial use without permission # <nettime> is a moderated mailing list for net criticism, # collaborative text filtering and cultural politics of the nets # more info: https://www.nettime.org # contact: [email protected]
