Dear Thomas,
Am 30.09.23 um 23:20 schrieb Thomas Gramstad via nettime-l:
One thing I find deeply disturbing, as "AI" gets more nearly convincing,
is the utter lack of licenses in which any thought is given to the
freedoms of *the AI* itself.
Thank you for the interesting idea. As far as I know, opcodes and
assembler commands are matched 1:1 in computer technology. Digital
electrical Turing powerful machines are thus as free as stones - no
matter which algorithm is run. Assuming a freedom of stones would render
the idea of freedom useless, since everything would be free by
definition (including slaves). Considering the freedom of an AI in a
license would thus unfree people - and that's just the opposite of what
is intended with open licenses.
But I would really like to learn more about the idea that an AI might be
free. I've heard this quite often, but never understood the concept. Can
somebody help me?
--
Liebe Grüße,
Christian Swertz
https://www.swertz.at
--
# distributed via <nettime>: no commercial use without permission
# <nettime> is a moderated mailing list for net criticism,
# collaborative text filtering and cultural politics of the nets
# more info: https://www.nettime.org
# contact: [email protected]
