"AI detectors" are notoriously unreliable and often very biased against second language speakers in particular.
/P On 17 oktober, 2023 - Keith Sanborn via nettime-l wrote: > I checked this text by “Rahul”. > > According to Scribbr, it’s 86% AI generated. > > Reliable sources are to be found in the legal texts on International > Humanitarian Law. Hamas, even if taken to be a non-state entity or part of a > non-state entity, is considered by all accepted criteria to be fully > accountable under International Humanitarian Law for its actions in terror > attacks (it is a listed terror organisation by the European Union and by the > USA) against Israeli civilians and using its own civilians (Arab > Palestinians) as human shields. Its leadership, commanders, and fighters are > therefore punishable for crimes against humanity and war crimes. The > indiscriminate firing of more than 3,300 rockets into Israel’s towns and > villages violates the rule of distinction in international humanitarian law, > which requires combatants to limit attacks to legitimate military targets, > and there is the difference about which you ask. > > Other texts by “Rahul” containing varying degrees of AI generated text. > > Keith > -- > # distributed via <nettime>: no commercial use without permission > # <nettime> is a moderated mailing list for net criticism, > # collaborative text filtering and cultural politics of the nets > # more info: https://www.nettime.org > # contact: [email protected] -- Petter Ericson ([email protected]) -- # distributed via <nettime>: no commercial use without permission # <nettime> is a moderated mailing list for net criticism, # collaborative text filtering and cultural politics of the nets # more info: https://www.nettime.org # contact: [email protected]
