Hello,
thanks for your posting and the nice images you painted with your words.
I really enjoyed reading them.
I would like to ask one question about this one:
One thing that is missing from David's recap was an aspect raised about
the intimidation factors ( also related to the Silence themes of late ),
Do you assume that the nettime-l archive is an intimidation factor and
thus prohibits people to post unusual or provocative ideas since they
could be attacked for that later with reference to the archive? As far
as I see, this cannot be denied. Even if the archive itself is certainly
not the crucial problem (all subscribers get all the mails anyway), this
could be the expression of a larger social problem. And I fully agree
that this problem is obviously connected to power dynamics.
Can we assume that all media are some sort of laboratories were people
are sitting in Petri-dishes (I really like your image of media as
Petri-dishes!)? If so, we also have to assume that the laboratories were
created by people. In this situation, we can not avoid sitting in a
laboratory - but we do not have to sit in other peoples Petri-dishes -
we can create our own ones. The disadvantage certainly is that we have
to blame ourselves for the food we get. But we might create a better
filling of the Petri-dish - or even a new laboratory. Im thus curious to
get to know your ideas about improving our little laboratory here (or
about creating alternatives one - I actually love to move between
laboratories. Would you share your toughts with us?
--
Liebe Grüße,
Christian Swertz
http://www.swertz.at
--
# distributed via <nettime>: no commercial use without permission
# <nettime> is a moderated mailing list for net criticism,
# collaborative text filtering and cultural politics of the nets
# more info: https://www.nettime.org
# contact: [email protected]
