+++

Steven Levitsky and Lucan Way have a good article in the latest Foreign Affairs.

The argument is pretty balanced and reasoned.  It suggests that the former 
conservative party of the USA, after having been hijacked by a kleptocratic 
demagogue and now fully assimilated to a radical regressive agenda, is headed 
toward (and well along the way to) not Mussolini or Stalin but Modi, Erdogan, 
and Orban. 

"...authoritarianism does not require the destruction of the constitutional 
order. What lies ahead is not fascist or single-party dictatorship but 
competitive authoritarianism—a system in which parties compete in elections but 
the incumbent’s abuse of power tilts the playing field against the opposition. 
Most autocracies that have emerged since the end of the Cold War fall into this 
category." 

They also explain well how the Constitution "all by itself" can't prevent this. 
 If a large enough party (the formerly conservative one) is backed by enough 
money there is no way for "normal" constitutional democracy to win on the basis 
of the rules plain and simple; by definition, when these transitions occur it 
is because those with the power to change the rules, and move the goalposts, 
have decided to do so or already have done, by fait accompli changed and moved 
them to where they can win say half the elections with only a third or a 
quarter or less of the votes.  The Federalist Paper No. 85's closing paragraph 
predicted it already in 1788, before the Union and before the Constitution: 
"the military despotism of a victorious demagogue."  

The key question, before everyone bounces up from table with a mouth full of 
bread and cheese to say they mean to stand no blasted nonsense, is not this 
diagnosis.  Many prefer others.  The key point for the purposes of this email 
thread is what the article recommends: to "stay in the game."  Choose 
resistance, dissent, persistent defiance, with dedication to successful 
reality-based alternatives plus a sincere responsibility for pragmatic 
real-world results, and do so to the absolute best of one's ability, while 
working well with others, starting yesterday.

Many people are despondent as we type today.  They want to curl up and go back 
to sleep, drop out of all voting, all dissent, all writing, all participation 
in anything because all has been lost, and blame the world, or history, or the 
heavens.  This is a sign your brain has been beaten up by the autocratic 
psychological goon squad.  It's what they want you to do: cower.  Think twice 
before you embrace it.

Put another way: even if it were worse than it is -- even if it got far worse 
-- would you have the right to cop out?  Think of what earlier generations had 
to put up with: Selma, Walesa, Mandela.  They put it on the line, sometimes, if 
they had to, if someone had to.  You get a free pass to do and risk nothing?  
Why?  Because you can do so comfortably?  Because you are fed up, or because 
you told us so, maybe even cried wolf and no one listened?  That's even less of 
an excuse, because it isn't about you and your comfort, your moods and wishes, 
your sensitivities and preferences.  You are obligated to help because you can, 
obligated to help on behalf of the many who cannot help themselves, and in 
recompense to all who strove and struggled in the past to achieve the good 
things you are so demoralized about losing last November.  It's not about you.

How not to drop out?  Keep doing your best.  Also straightforward, I won't go 
into it.  But plain and simple, look at Abraham Lincoln's Cooper Union Address: 
"Neither let us be slandered from our duty by false accusations against us, nor 
frightened from it by menaces of destruction to the Government nor of dungeons 
to ourselves. LET US HAVE FAITH THAT RIGHT MAKES MIGHT, AND IN THAT FAITH, LET 
US, TO THE END, DARE TO DO OUR DUTY AS WE UNDERSTAND IT."  (All caps are from 
the internet, and happy birthday.)  

+

Maybe you didn't want to have to oppose an aggressive autocratizing movement 
this year.  Like me, maybe you hoped they'd not be voted in.  But they were, 
and we do.  And you have to oppose it not just by yourself, like a superhero 
with a cape and dashing boots, able to fix it all in one day on your own and 
lonesome.  You have to work with a governing coalition of great and durable 
strength, depth, breadth, and diversity.  You have to regroup lightning fast or 
will be looking at a retreat and rout you never dreamed of.  Going adolescent 
rogue will hardly suffice when it comes to saving the republic.  

But how?  They have taken over all the agencies.  Well, the Levitsky-Way 
article says clearly: civil society must stand up.  Stop dreaming that the 
Constitution, a piece of paper with ink on it, will fix it all for you.  It's 
going to be a tough decade, so learn to write with the pen they can't take 
away, or can't yet.  Type.  Photograph.  Converse.  Express.  Make video.  Have 
you forgotten so completely what improvisation even is?  Find a bucket of cold 
water and dunk your head in it if you have to and snap out of it.  Ask an old 
person about the old days.  

Write about what?  Well, the article says that too.  It's not rocket science.  
You're tired, you say?  Take a nap then, but when you wake up get to work.  You 
don't know how?  Improvise.  Experiment.  Collaborate.  Innovate.  Imitate.  
Emulate.  Share and uplike on social media -- the new smoking -- even though 
their robots are watching, or preferably in a real place like a classroom or 
cafe.  How can we expect the people of China or anywhere to rise up online if 
we won't even lift a finger for our most sacred ideals?  Lincoln didn't say, 
"we don't have to do anything because Right always makes Might."  Rather, he 
said, right can sometimes make might, and can sometimes defeat might makes 
right, but it always requires work and bravery, so be brave and get to work.  
You have to believe it can happen before it can happen; call that faith if you 
want or just call it math, or quantum, or common sense.  That's where the 
psychological sludge of Prosopographia, ancient greek for "face writing," 
weighs you down.  I'm sorry if you are down, but I can't go there with you 
because there are responsibilities to keep.

I'm not saying there isn't a lot to do; there is.  The USA could take this 
klepto-demagogue interregnum as a wake-up call and revive itself and its civic 
virtue, or we could bottom out soggy as a wet paper bag into examples like 
those in the article.  It's not written in stone, what happens the rest of this 
year; just look at "Fluke" by Brian Klaas and contingent evolution.  Don't 
underestimate yourself and others, especially not before you even try, because 
you don't know what you are capable of doing but haven't done yet.  

Imagine a people that saw such a blatant, ignorant, ignominious takeover 
attempt by narcissistic tycoons and repelled it by means of virtuous 
cooperative principled culture.  Thought-experiment up a use case that passes 
the stress test, like in the John Lennon song, or some other song, or a poem, 
legend, or myth.  Utopia is impossible, and we cannot undo the past, but we can 
choose greater peace and justice over runaway violence and hate, 
schizmogenetically like the indigenous critique and Graeber said, and go from 
there.  We can heal humanity and restore the planet, gradually but genuinely, 
starting with poverty and climate infrastructure, and all the better, perhaps 
even spectacularly well, if we can sell peaceful reform to China and sidestep 
the Thucydides trap by choosing right in the 1978 Truth Criterion Controversy.  
Xi and P will laugh well if we go in for autocracy ourselves for real, but 
their thoughtocracy cannot escape the modernization experience and 
enlightenment common sense if we stick with it.  Convincing Xi to redefine his 
own Thought in the light of true experience, Jingyan, is the heavy lift, but 
many lifts in history have been heavy yet still got lifted.  

+

Here is a simple list of 11 to-do's:

1.  Call it what it is: klepto-demagogue, radical regressive, competitive 
authoritarianism, Orbanization, rank abandonment of constitutional democracy, 
liquidation of all Judeo-Christian and classical Greco-Roman ethics in pursuit 
of pure Caesarist retrench out of fear and lack of imagination.  Be direct.  
It's OK.  Progressives in the USA have had to confront oligarchs and megacorps 
in the past with their demagogues and apparatus of despair, and did so 
reasonably well, allied with moderates of course indispensably, once the 
terrible harm to the common good was recognized so there's no need to reinvent 
the wheel.  Strong language does not however obviate the need to compromise and 
cooperate on practical real world alternatives.

2.  Don't flail:  Let go of your fantasy of a Bernie revolution, as Bernie 
himself admonishes you must.  If progressives, moderates, and conservatives of 
conscience cannot pool their efforts, at least for a while, the radical 
regressive party of klepto-demagogues will win in a walk every time.  Figure 
out how to unify; make it work.  Hang together, or surely hang separately.  
Stick together even after a loss, if you harbor any hope at all of a future win 
or draw.  Again, do you have a right to curl up or throw a tantrum and stop 
trying or caring?  Blame and abscond?  No, you don't, any more than you ever 
had permission to do nothing at all for the greater good.  Avoid, like the 
plague, all non-starters including the abolition of private property, the 
abolition of all religions (not even just the ones you dislike), and the 
abolition of all government.  Learn hybrid, like market economics with moral 
sentiments and good governance and safety nets; respect for all cultures and 
faiths i.e. de pace fidei; and constitutional democracy (that thing you say 
you're trying to defend) as the modern improvement on divine-right monarchy.  
Account for your own inner massive contradictions, and even your deleterious 
personal habits if you have any, because like it or not you and I are both part 
of the problem.  

3.  Call out Machiavelli: the roots of this problem go deep, all the way back 
to the earliest beginnings of the modern idea which in Europe's historical flow 
(still in motion) has two main streams.  One is Machiavelli, might makes right, 
Il Principe, the ends justify the means.  The other is Dante, right makes 
might, separation of church and state, development through progress, education, 
cooperation, vertical movement up and out of Plato's cave into reality's 
natural light (i.e. from the ninth circle of hell up to the very tip-top 
singularity, radius-wise), harmony with the biosphere, and all other common 
good Principia.  If you want to refuse to believe in anything at all except 
Machiavelli you are embracing defeat without even a struggle.  Find a way to 
right makes might you can work with, even if it is just De Pace Fidei, Gaia 
theory, the golden rule, or plain old compassion and the Prisoner's Dilemma.  
Find it now, right now, by end of day, at least a placeholder, lest the tragedy 
of the commons become total.

4.  Access Leonardo: all reformers, all champions of right making might, have 
faced Envy (i.e. Apelles' Calumny, once copied by Botticelli) from those who 
want might makes right.  Sometimes -- well actually, always -- the forces of 
Envy wield secret police and all manner of harrassments against Virtue.  
Discretion has been used, including during and even before the first modern 
inquisition launched in Europe around 1516.  Leonardo kept his information 
system of visual plus verbal network engineering, in defense of Esperienza, 
experience and experiment, all the arts and all the sciences, secret just 
enough, maternally if you will, that it could dodge the future's bonfire while 
remaining decipherable by the likes of us.  At least look into it: what if he 
left us a back door, an easter egg, a failsafe even the Church can finally 
support and every tourist is familiar with?  Wouldn't you have done the same, 
back then, if you could?  Also network with Ken Burns, whose film on the 
American Revolution is due out in nine months.  Read Hamilton on experience, 
experientia, as the foundation of both modern arts and sciences and 
constitutional democracy; link the Federalist No. 85 to Hume on experience, and 
Hume to Francis and Roger Bacon in re experientia, what Cervantes called 
"experiencia, the mother of all sciences."  The European tradition since 
ancient Greece has based truth and beauty, knowledge and justice, that is, all 
civilized good, on three main pillars: Reason (ratio, logic); Tradition (or 
authority, i.e. custom, convention, inertia, and institution); and Experience 
(which means lived actuality and experimentation as a method, history and 
science, all of the arts including tech and all forms of conscious process a 
priori or a posteriori undergone or undergoable).  Experience is moreover, 
precisely and rigorously, what the klepto-demagogue and Machiavelli aim to 
instrumentalize, monetize, and dominate through surveillance algorithm 
technology; it is also that which Dante and Leonardo (Europe-wise) sought to 
reform, advance, and sustainably improve using all the sciences and all the 
arts.  The word needs true focus, Esperienza as such both real and ideal, past 
present and future, same as that which the word denotes: ce n'est pas et c'est 
une pipe; es y no es una pipa.  Not coincidentally the Machiavellians, who 
cannot prevail without myriad machines, use AI-GPT to coopt and colonize first 
and foremost the EXPERIENCE of the humans they seek to oppress; if you let them 
that's on you.  You gotta fight even intellectually and internally to be free.  
It is no coincidence or surprise that the worst Machiavellian politicians and 
the most Machiavellian techbros are cheek and jowl in the USA's current 
misguided authoritarian shift attempt.  Gates owns a Leonardo; he might want to 
help save democracy.  Certainly the smiling portrait of Esperienza can help you 
see, sense, and speak about this all while staying calm.

5.  Clear your clutter: What goes through your head when you are deep in funk 
that nothing can be done?  I.D. that what and get it out.  Ask a friend to 
help.  Unblock.  You may need to rid yourself of Machiavellian theory and its 
many prolific descendants, most especially Foucault, Lenin, and everything 
post-Enlightenment: they were all traps.  Even if you wrote your dissertation 
on them or published a book heaven forfend.  The whole "there is no truth, 
there is no right and wrong, there is no nature, there is no progress, might 
makes right and everything is constructed only" line of cacophanous euphony 
will shut you down before you even start by denying every reality basis.  If 
you struggle, start from scratch with partials: "there is some truth; there is 
some right and wrong; there is some nature; there is some progress; right can 
sometimes make might; construction is not all there is; and all these facts 
matter."  If you don't like the old-fashioned caricatures of constitutional 
democracy advertised by the authorities, evolve and refine them as hybrids 
responsibly, but junk them totalistically at everyone's peril.  

6.  Get and give help:  Collaborate collaborate collaborate, redundify, and 
magnifize: that is what networks do, but only if you do the network right.  
Your job, that is.  Abhor Nozick's "experience machine" and help others abhor 
it too.  This seems impossible until you try it and get the hang of it, then 
it's very natural and intuitive like play.  'Tis a gift to be simple.

7.  Embrace reality but imagine progress: things are bad, but if you give up 
completely you guarantee they'll stay that way at best and almost certainly get 
worse.  The future is not locked in, so progress can happen; even serious 
progress of the kind you have always wanted to see.  If it's your place to just 
bag sand till you keel over, well start bagging.  Think of those who cannot act 
with the freedom and efficacy you enjoy, and consider your responsibility to 
them, despite whatever your own likes and dislikes might prefer.  Befriend 
serendipity as well as your share of the chores.

8.  Question the master of puppets: these techno-autocrats are incompetent 
idiots on almost every level.  Only through your own unchecked fear, panic, and 
self-disfranchisement can they prevail.  Their so-called plans are 99% baloney, 
lies, and graft.  They have no real plan for peace with China, nor the green 
transition, nor sustainability in any sense; they are mostly clowns.  Scary, 
bad, incompetent, ignorant, uneducated clowns as described in book 7 of Plato's 
Politeia.  Consider them the doofuses that they are.  Outclass them; do not 
adulate nor overestimate their putative wizardry.

9.  Get it on: think you're nimble?  Were you ever?  Read Calvino's Six Memos 
on Cavalcanti's leap over the tombstones to outrun his local goon squad and 
make your own copy.  Improvise.  Use your words.  Keep on keeping on and stay 
frosty, be active, go not easily into that good night.  Articulate unified 
dissent; defend Enlightenment values of the rule of law and systems of rights.  
Be a part of the solution, even just in a small ordinary way if nothing big and 
extraordinary presents itself, or until it does.  Engage.  

10.  Don't take the bait: the autocratizers will use ample brutality for both 
direct effect and for spectacle.  It's on the way soon, probably as soon as 
winter's over and people get outside.  Don't take the bait.  They will try to 
make it look like the traitorous opposition "started it" and their citizen 
freedom fighters only acted in self-defense.  Don't start it, or even look like 
you want to.  Be smart, like Selma.  Avoid the mayhem nights of George Floyd's 
protests and emulate the peaceful protest days.  Authoritarian psych ops will 
tell you that you can't win unless you freak out, go berserk, and tilt at 
windmills.  Don't indulge yourself, and don't indulge your friends if you care 
about the result.  This isn't a rave or a video game.  You have to practice 
self-control, or you will be exploited by Il Principe's AI-GPT.

11.  Be responsible: or if you can't be responsible, start to become more so.  
This crisis is not about protest as an end in itself; the opposition can't just 
tear down anything and everything.  They must build and maintain a viable 
alternative governing coalition, which will at least short term and probably 
longer require the heresy of compromise.  This is not a vice or failing; it's 
called "unified opposition" and "mutual self-defense."  Don't make the perfect 
the enemy of the good enough.  Don't self-indulge even if you're desperate to.  
Coalitionize accountably.  If you refuse to make alliances, the course of 
events will have no other option but to favor the authoritarians. 
 
+

All best of luck to you I send, and see my interview with @KenBurns for more 
details.  Take good care of yourself and keep your wellness up with good sleep, 
diet, friends, and exercise, because you and all of us will need it.  Mistakes 
at first are fine, as is being awkward, so be kind; just take note and try 
again and soon your skills will improve.  

FedPaper and Hamilton deets, the first edition of 1788, are at 
ExperienceDemocracy2024.org/experience-democracy-is, or just use ctrl+F to scan 
the Federalist Papers Nos. 1 and 85 for keyword "experience."  A huge lot of 
great Leonardo/Esperienza content, much of it by real scholars and experts not 
me, is at Leonardo.info/is-everyone-a-leonardo (scroll down for Ken Burns 
interview).  I wrote a giant PDF too that is free, and has a bibliography with 
roughly accurate citations.  Check also the Novum Organum, Book 1, section 97 
(XCVII), or the Opus Majus of 1267, Book VI, De Scientia Experimentalis; Il 
Principe XV, the Paradiso I & II, or the "Leonardo da Vinci" and "Conclusion" 
essays from Pater's super-timely The Renaissance of 1873.  Check too maybe 
Benjamin's essay "Experience" and his planned "Critique of Pure Experience," 
erfahrung and erlebniz in his vernacular contrasting Kant, or even Plato's 
Politeia Book 7.  Gutenberg plus ctrl+F equals your friend.  

Basically most if not all pre-computer, honest investigations of experience, 
experientia, experiencia, esperienza, or Jingyan, or patisamvedeti, and all 
decent studies of present-moment awareness from any cultural tradition, will be 
helpful, but beware of Il Principes bearing experience machines!  :)  

+

The article by Levitsky and Way concludes, both dire and optimistic:

"HOLD THE LINE"
"America is on the cusp of competitive authoritarianism. The Drumpf 
administration has already begun to weaponize state institutions and deploy 
them against opponents. The Constitution alone cannot save U.S. democracy. Even 
the best-designed constitutions have ambiguities and gaps that can be exploited 
for antidemocratic ends. After all, the same constitutional order that 
undergirds America’s contemporary liberal democracy permitted nearly a century 
of authoritarianism in the Jim Crow South, the mass internment of Japanese 
Americans, and McCarthyism. In 2025, the United States is governed nationally 
by a party with greater will and power to exploit constitutional and legal 
ambiguities for authoritarian ends than at any time in the past two centuries.

"Drumpf will be vulnerable. The administration’s limited public support and 
inevitable mistakes will create opportunities for democratic forces—in 
Congress, in courtrooms, and at the ballot box.

"But the opposition can win only if it stays in the game. Opposition under 
competitive authoritarianism can be grueling. Worn down by harassment and 
threats, many of Drumpf’s critics will be tempted to retreat to the sidelines. 
Such a retreat would be perilous. When fear, exhaustion, or resignation crowds 
out citizens’ commitment to democracy, emergent authoritarianism begins to take 
root."

+++




-- 
# distributed via <nettime>: no commercial use without permission
# <nettime> is a moderated mailing list for net criticism,
# collaborative text filtering and cultural politics of the nets
# more info: https://www.nettime.org
# contact: [email protected]

Reply via email to