https://reactionary.international/investigations/accenture-architect-of-global-reaction/en/
Today, the Progressive International, Expose Accenture and the Movement
Research Unit release the Accenture Files, revealing the central role of the
world’s largest consultancy in the global right-ward turn towards surveillance,
exclusion, and strong-men: The Reactionary International.
Based on extensive fieldwork, interviews, and a comprehensive review of
internal documents, our investigation demonstrates how Accenture has quietly
embedded itself deep into the apparatus of security states worldwide, deploying
its vast network of resources, wealth and technology to surveil entire
populations, fuel the military-industrial complex and channel immense public
wealth to private hands.
Our research — spanning over 41 contract case studies across North America,
Europe, Africa, and Asia — reveals that Accenture has joined forces with some
of the world’s most notorious tech surveillance giants to advance an agenda of
extraction, exploitation and oppression. We discovered, for example, that the
firm has joined forces with Peter Thiel’s Palantir to ensure their influence
stretches right to the centre of government. In Britain, this partnership has
already seen the companies secure a contract worth almost £500 million with the
National Health Service, accelerating the institution's privatisation by some
of the world’s largest multinational outfits.
Such contracts, however, are just one example of how Accenture is empowered to
shape the world around us. From biometric databases which catalogue billions of
people to predictive policing algorithms that target individuals before they've
committed any crime, our research identifies Accenture as central to the
operation of the world’s reactionary forces.
However, our investigation uncovered gaping cracks in Accenture’s operation,
long concealed by a thin veneer of corporate legitimacy. Connecting the dots in
the firm’s global activity, we found a catalogue of scandal and failure. Our
research studies the myriad of lucrative contracts which Accenture has won from
government’s around the world to reveal a consistent pattern of bid-rigging,
corruption and neglect. Never before have these ties to the world’s states been
collated in such a manner.
Operating in the shadows, Accenture has escaped accountability and evaded
public scrutiny for far too long. Today, we initiate the process of bringing
their nefarious activities and nebulous relationships to light.
Origins: From Accounting Scandal to Border Surveillance Empire
Accenture originated from Arthur Andersen, Enron's notorious accounting firm.
Operating as Andersen's business and technology consulting division in the
early 1950s, it rebranded as Accenture in 2001 amid the Enron accounting
scandal. That same year, Accenture made history as the first major professional
services firm to incorporate offshore in Bermuda, likely for tax benefits,
before later moving to Ireland where it secured a tax rate of just 3.5%compared
to 24% in the UK.
The firm rose rapidly through the ranks of America's IT government contractors
climbing from 59th to 24th in just three years following the 9/11 terror
attacks. Today, Accenture ranks 8th in US contractors and has engagements with
the Department of Homeland Security, the Department of Defense and ICE among
others. This ascent was largely powered by a single contract between Accenture
and the Department of Homeland Security to build the US-VISIT program, which
established the foundation for the United States' biometric surveillance state.
The US-VISIT program, a cornerstone of Washington’s security architecture
amidst the ‘War on Terror’, involved creating the Automated Biometric
Identification System (IDENT) — then the largest biometric database in the US
and second-largest in the world, containing information on some 200 million
people who had entered or exited the country.
US-VISIT shares biometric data with the CIA, FBI, DHS, Border Patrol, and more.
Under the contract, Accenture gave the US the capability to record the comings
and goings of non-citizens at over 400 ports of entry through digital finger
scans and digital photographs.
Internal emails later revealed that Accenture had advised the Department of
Homeland Security to "limit the number of bidders" in order to capture the
contract. The company even moved into government offices where the work would
be carried out four months before the contract was awarded.
Propelled to prominence with the support of the US state, today
Accentureemploys three-quarters of a million people and boasts more than 200
offices – one of which hosts an Israeli consulate – across 49 countries. The
firm generated $64.1 billion of revenue in 2023 alone.
The Accenture-Palantir Alliance: Merging Consultancy with Surveillance
Our investigation reveals that in recent years Accenture has cemented a global
partnership with Palantir, the controversial data analytics firm founded by
Peter Thiel that has faced criticism for its role in enabling deportations,
predictive policing, and military targeting operations. This alliance
represents a dangerous convergence of Accenture's public sector reach with
Palantir's surveillance capabilities.
In 2022, we found that Accenture launched a new innovation center with Palantir
to design technological solutions using Palantir Foundry — a central operating
software that optimizes big data to support decision-making across industries.
The following year, the partnership secured a £480 million contract to deliver
the Federated Data Platform for NHS England, despite protests from healthcare
workers concerned about patient privacy and Palantir's links to military
operations. It is also important to note that the NHS data is considered one of
the most valuable datasets in the world.
In 2023, Accenture made a $3 billion investment in its AI capabilities. Our
research uncovered that both Accenture and Palantir participated in the
inaugural "AI for War" conference in 2024, highlighting their shared commitment
to militarizing artificial intelligence. Indeed, Palantir works closely with
Israeli intelligence and has a role in the IDF’s system which generates targets
for bombing raids.
This strategic alliance amplifies both companies' capacities to build and
deploy international surveillance systems. While Palantir has gained notoriety
for its work with intelligence agencies and military clients, Accenture has
managed to maintain a lower public profile while facilitating similar
capabilities through government contracts worldwide.
The Biometric Borderlands: Accenture's Global Surveillance Architecture
Accenture's handling of biometric data and risk-assessment algorithms during
the US-VISIT program established the technological foundation for the detention
and interrogation regime of the post-9/11 years. It provided Accenture with the
expertise and government connections to expand its biometric surveillance
business around the world.
In 2010, our investigation discovered that Accenture secured a contract with
India to implement the "Aadhaar" program – now the world's largest biometric
database with information on 1.3 billion people. We learnt that the contract
affords Accenture the right to "use, store, transfer, process, and link" data
to any individual.
In 2015, Accenture developed a "global" biometric identity management system
(BIMS) for the United Nations High Commissioner for Refugees to collect and
analyze the biometric data of over 450,000 refugees in Thailand and Chad,
stating they were looking for more opportunities to "spread BIMS worldwide.”
More recently, our investigation found that Accenture was awarded a contract
worth between €50-100 million by the Finnish Migri Immigration Service to
automate the permit process for migration to Finland.
Accenture's vision for border security, outlined in internal documents,
describes a "futuristic surveillance and intelligence network" relying on
"databases, digital cameras, face- and voice-recognition systems and
electronic-fingerprint readers, all linked by computer." As our investigation
reveals, this vision has steadily materialized through contracts with border
security agencies around the world, placing private actors like Accenture at
the centre of fortifying the world’s borders.
In promotional materials for their refugee biometric systems, we found that
Accenture used the image of a young Syrian boy who had drowned to highlight the
"humanitarian crisis," while simultaneously writing that "there are terrorists
who choose to pose as refugees.”
An employee of the Department for Homeland Security bluntly relayed the
implications of Accenture’s population-management systems: "The only way for an
individual to ensure he or she is not subject to collection of biometric
information when traveling internationally is to refrain from traveling.”
Algorithmic Policing: Predicting "Crime" Before It Happens
Beyond border security, Accenture has aggressively marketed "predictive
policing" and risk-assessment algorithms to law enforcement agencies worldwide.
In 2014, our investigation found that Accenture created risk scores to
determine the likelihood that individuals were linked to known gangs for
London’s Metropolitan Police. At the time, privacy campaigners warned that the
program was indiscriminately gathering data and making life-altering
classifications of people without warrants or due process.
Our investigation uncovered at least 13 police forces across three continents
that have contracted with Accenture for predictive policing technologies. In
the UK alone, Accenture has secured contracts with the Metropolitan Police (£80
million in 2016), West Midlands Police (£25 million in 2014, £5 million in
2019), Sussex Police (£29 million in 2017), and Police Scotland (£46 million in
2013, later canceled).
The Metropolitan Police entered into a "Digital Policing Framework Agreement"
with Accenture in 2017, essentially establishing the company as a preferred
long-term supplier that could secure future public work without further
tendering processes. This arrangement follows a pattern our investigators have
observed across multiple countries, where Accenture first secures IT
modernization contracts before pushing more invasive surveillance technologies.
In the United States, Accenture has worked with police departments in Seattle,
San Francisco, and Minneapolis. In 2017, Accenture implemented predictive
policing for the Seattle Police Department to "predict crime" before it
happened and to leverage body-worn cameras to vindicate officers accused in
use-of-force cases. That same year, Accenture developed a risk score for every
person receiving welfare in Rotterdam, Netherlands, to predict who was likely
"cheating" on their benefits. A Wired report found the algorithm was
consistently biased along lines of gender and ethnicity, with a review
concluding it "performs little better than random selection.”
In 2019, Accenture created a system for the West Midlands Police in the UK that
uses AI, statistics, and police data to identify individuals "at risk of
committing future crimes" for additional police monitoring and targeting.
We found that Accenture is currently working with police forces in the Indian
states of Uttar Pradesh and Bihar to use algorithms to target people before
they've ever committed a crime, with a managing director for Accenture Digital
stating they are "trying to do facial recognition to understand the mood of the
crowd.”
Accenture’s Chief Risk Officer has previously stated that the company doesn't
want to "get to the point where we're arresting people before they commit a
crime, but the idea of using analytics is to predict likely behavior" — a
troubling framing that still assumes the capability to identify ‘pre-criminals’
is both possible and desirable.
Connecting the Dots: The Israel-India-Accenture Nexus
Among the most concerning aspects of Accenture's global operations which our
investigation uncovered is the firm’s role in facilitating the transfer of
military and surveillance technologies between countries, particularly Israel
and India.
In 2017, we found that Accenture began championing military and intelligence
ties between the two nations, proposing partnerships where "Israeli defense
companies [could] leverage India's engineering talent to develop a global
maintenance fleet for servicing defense equipment globally." That same year,
over $2 billion worth of defense technologies were exported from Israel to
India. “In the policing space in India, we are leveraging a lot of these things
that we are doing in other countries," said Accenture Managing Director for
Advanced Analytics. Meanwhile, as Accenture brokered Israel-India weapons,
surveillance, and police technology transfers, India began to abandon its
longstanding support of Palestinian liberation, abstaining from votes which
advocated for a “humanitarian truce” at the UN.
One year earlier, Accenture acquired the Israeli cyberwarfare firm Maglan, "a
team of highly skilled cybersecurity professionals, who honed their skills
fighting cyber crime and confronting cyber espionage around the globe." The
company is named after the Maglan Special Forces Unit of the Israeli military,
which has been implicated in numerous controversial operations including the
1996 Lebanon massacre, 2014 Gaza missions, 2020 killings in the Golan Heights,
and on-video killings of individuals with raised hands. To this day, on
LinkedIn Accenture Israel is called “Accenture Security Israel (Maglan)”.
Our research reveals that Accenture has also invested in Team8, an Israeli
cybersecurity company founded by Nadav Zafrir – former Commander of Israel's
Technology & Intelligence Unit 8200. Unit 8200, Israel's equivalent to the NSA,
has faced criticism from its own veterans, with 43 signing a protest letter in
2014 decrying what they called the unit's abusive gathering of Palestinians'
private information.
What’s more, we discovered that Accenture collaborates with NASSCOM (National
Association of Software and Service Companies) on the IINSPIRE (Israel-India
Startup Platform for Innovative Research and Entrepreneurship) initiative. This
platform aims to drive innovation synergies between India and Israel, fostering
a structured and systematic approach to surveillance and oppression of
Palestinians. Indeed, Accenture bosses in India and Israel have declared their
shared intent to take the states’ cybersecurity and defence relationship “to
the next level”.
In June 2024, our investigation found that Accenture announced a strategic
collaboration with major US weapons developer L3Harris – a top supplier of
component parts for Lockheed Martin’s F-35 warplanes, which were instrumental
in Israel’s 15-month bombardment of the Gaza Strip from October 2023.
Our investigation uncovered just some of the real-world consequences of the
technology transfer facilitated by Accenture. Indian officials have been
documented using Israeli drone technology to monitor protests and drop tear
gas, while Israeli drones were used against Palestinian protesters during the
Great March of Return. Our research found that both nations have consistently
deployed extensive CCTV networks, facial recognition systems, and surveillance
software like Pegasus to target journalists, activists, and minorities.
Accenture built the US-VISIT biometric database to collect info on foreign
nationals. Aadhaar researchers argue it is “used primarily for furthering
state surveillance.”The Scandal Factory: A Global Pattern of Corruption and
Failure
Our investigation has identified a disturbing pattern across Accenture's
operations: the company secures lucrative contracts, often through questionable
means, delivers substandard results, and yet continues to win new business. The
scandal trail spans continents and decades:
• Angola's Dos Santos Contracts (2020): Accenture received $54 million for
work with Isabel dos Santos, daughter of Angola's autocratic then-president, as
part of a system that gave legitimacy to her empire while she laundered money.
• Australian Border Force (2015-2017): Accenture's $17.6 million contract
with the Australian Department of Home Affairs to create a US-style
"super-department" was cut short due to dissatisfaction with performance and
concerns over costs outweighing savings.
• Brazil's DataPrev (2020): Despite previous controversy where Accenture
failed to deliver a contracted platform service, the company won a $1.5 million
contract to manage the sale of Brazil's state-owned firms, including the social
security technology company DataPrev, amid widespread labor union protests
against privatization.
• Scotland Police (2013): Accenture was awarded a fixed-price contract
worth over $58 million to build a national IT system. Within weeks, despite 18
months of pre-award discussion, disagreements emerged about whether the
proposed system would deliver the requirements. The contract was canceled, and
Accenture had to pay a $14.8 million settlement.
• UK NHS Digital (2018-19): NHS Digital awarded contracts worth £33 million
to Accenture, representing 15% of its total operating expenditure that year.
This raised conflict of interest concerns as two NHS Digital board members had
previously worked at Accenture. Notably, Matthew Swindells, Deputy Chief
Executive of NHS England until 2019, left in 2019 to be a freelancer for
Accenture's digital arm.
• Accenture German Contracting Scandal (2020): German Defense Minister
Ursula von der Leyen was investigated for her ministry preferentially
advantaging Accenture.
• Luxembourg Tax Scandal (2019): Accenture paid Swiss authorities
approximately $200 million over tax claims prompted by the International
Consortium of Investigative Journalists' Luxembourg Leaks investigation, which
uncovered 546 secret tax deals involving more than 1,000 businesses.
• US Customs and Border Protection (2018-2019): Accenture was awarded a
$297 million contract to recruit 7,500 border agents. After 10 months and $13.6
million spent, they had produced only "two accepted job offers." The contract
was eventually canceled after the Department of Homeland Security's Inspector
General issued a scathing report.
• Ohio Office of Budget and Management (2007): A backup tape containing
sensitive financial information was stolen from an Accenture intern's car.
Accenture was using the information to develop a similar system for Ohio
without proper authorization. The Governor initiated a review of the contract,
and the Attorney General filed a civil complaint against Accenture.
• US Marine Corps (2005): A six-month contract to implement a new global
supply chain and maintenance system was terminated after Accenture "did not
meet the contract's requirements, terms and conditions."
• Colorado Department of Labor and Employment (2002): Accenture was awarded
$50 million in contracts to re-engineer the state's unemployment insurance and
voting systems. The company missed deadlines and was found to be in breach of
contract, eventually refunding $8.2 million on one contract while the other was
terminated.
These failures represent just a fraction of the problematic contracts our
investigation has uncovered. This series of scandals, however, has had minimal
impact on Accenture's ability to secure new state business — pointing to
Accenture’s nebulous and covert relationships with government actors around the
world.
The Global Architecture of Reaction
Around the world, the willingness of governments to empower consultancy firms
like Accenture is only growing.
Since 2016, the consulting industry has expanded steadily in nearly every
country:
• In the United Kingdom, contracts outsourced to consultants increased by
over 370% to $3.95 billion from 2016 to 2022. Accenture alone received £350
million from the UK Government in 2023/2025 as a designated "Strategic
Supplier."
• In France, consultants received over $2.6 billion in contracts since 2018.
• In Canada, the government’s spending on third-party consultants
balloonedto $16.4 billion in 2019-2020.
With exorbitant hourly rates and a lack of true expertise, firms like Accenture
drive up the cost of public services, deliver "market-based" solutions that
further privatize the public sector, and hamstring governments' ability to
quickly respond to crises themselves.
Our investigation demonstrates that in nearly every country in which it
operates, Accenture serves as an anti-democratic force that helps to siphon
public money away from the people toward the ruling class.
From weapons contracts with Israel to surveillance contracts with India, we
have revealed how Accenture is embedded worldwide as a provider of repressive
technologies to authoritarian governments.
Our investigation demonstrates how Accenture's work informs who is designated
as a "foreigner" or "risky," and in turn, who should be eligible for government
benefits, detained for questioning, deported, and potentially targeted in
military campaigns. Consequently, the world’s largest consultancy firm can be
understood to form the backbone of the
Reactionary International.
A Call to Investigators
Companies like Palantir and Lockheed Martin are well-known as providers of
sinister and deadly technologies. When these companies' names are attached to a
project, the world keeps a close eye. Accenture belongs in a similar category
of notoriety, yet it has largely escaped such scrutiny, operating behind a
veneer of corporate respectability.
When Accenture is involved in a government deal, our investigation demonstrates
some common themes, from bid fixing to predictive policing, "smart" borders to
the targeting of racial minorities. Yet most of the firm’s contracts remain
hidden from public view.
We need more investigators to examine Accenture’s local contracts, their
contents, and their implications for civil liberties and human rights. The
world’s largest consultancy company has built a global surveillance syndicate
that enables state violence and undermines democratic governance. It's time to
pull back the curtain on one of the most powerful yet least scrutinized
components of the Reactionary International.
--
# distributed via <nettime>: no commercial use without permission
# <nettime> is a moderated mailing list for net criticism,
# collaborative text filtering and cultural politics of the nets
# more info: https://www.nettime.org
# contact: [email protected]
