There is a persistent mythology emerging from the Bitcoin worshipers,
that machines running smart contracts can be 'independent legal entities'.
I have heard it multiple times at various public occasions: someone has
set up a machine as a legal entity, with hands-off approach after
programming, and that machine is running transactions on its own, while
the owner (now just a shareholder) has legally nothing to do with it,
shielded from its actions through the act of incorporation.
This is of course silly, for the time being. But these people (assorted
co-founders, cube slaves and marketeers from BC-centric startups) appear
to really believe it, or at least say so.
The notion that machines are people is taking hold (not so new - "but
the computer says so" justification is at least 20 years old.) How long
will this be silly remains to be seen. The step from 'corporations are
people' to 'machines are people' might be a small one.
# distributed via <nettime>: no commercial use without permission
# <nettime> is a moderated mailing list for net criticism,
# collaborative text filtering and cultural politics of the nets
# more info: http://mx.kein.org/mailman/listinfo/nettime-l
# archive: http://www.nettime.org contact: nett...@kein.org
# @nettime_bot tweets mail w/ sender unless #ANON is in Subject: