Thank you for this post. The analogy to space and property values in
Dubai...perfectly clear. A city surely growing on overinflated speculative
wealth —and the fantasies of power that go with it—-not to mention other
cities, maybe Shanghai, that attract foreign, western capital.

Operative word: Accumulation—from data—living data —-aesthetically in the
arts we lean in post-global directions and scope, visualized by wide-angle
drone shots, GIS, and data visualizations that “take in the whole picture” —

 Accumulation and organization of data to take in the whole -
 -thievery of fractional parts of someone’s bank interest x 1 kabillion
tent thefts = tidy sum;
-ubiquitous delivery systems for payment, scooping up dollars
-The decentralization of accounts - capacity to hide ones money off shore,
etc.
-an excess of fees
-“mining”, “data mining” as paradigm, perceptual shift —imagined as a
vastness from which one takes (nature)



-
-


On Thu, Dec 14, 2017 at 1:21 AM Felix Stalder <fe...@openflows.com> wrote:

>
> Bitcoin seems, to me, to indicate how much criminal, speculative money
> there is out there, seeking risk worth taking, rather than "investing"
> in a traditional sense. There is simply too much money held by too few
> people who now trade it among themselves, rather than seeking to extract
> surplus value from labor. There are only so many apartments one can buy
> in Dubai and all that money needs to go somewhere.
>
> Take the bitcoin exchange rate of the last three years as a fractal
> image of the income/wealth distribution of the last thirty years.
> Exponential acceleration within exponential acceleration.
>
> That vehicle that this money latched onto is about the utopia of machine
> peerage, tells us something about the state of the world, in which
> technical thinking dominates and people simply don't count and, as long
> as they remain necessary, most of them are forcefully written out of the
> story. For a micro-account how invisibility is created/enforced, see
> Andrew Wilson's great work "Workers Leaving the Googleplex"
>
> https://vimeo.com/15852288
>
> Machines, as Morlock pointed out, are simply more efficient at
> everything (often in practice, but particularly in theory), in part
> because we defined the world -- and ourselves -- in machine terms, by
> accepting information theory as communication theory.
>
> Back to the excess money. The sane option would be to tax that money,
> but doesn't look likely in the US/EU, so the other option to break that
> extremely unstable distribution of income and wealth become more likely:
> war. Historically, this is how I understand Piketty, there have only
> been these two options.
>
>
>
>
>
>
>
> On 2017-12-13 20:41, Morlock Elloi wrote:
> > Bitcoin successfully hijacked a sizable amount of public belief, which
> > underwrites any fiat currency, and it doesn't get more fiat than Bitcoin.
>
> <...>
>
>
>
> --
>
>  ||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||| http://felix.openflows.com
>  |OPEN PGP:  https://pgp.mit.edu/pks/lookup?search=0x0C9FF2AC
>
> #  distributed via <nettime>: no commercial use without permission
> #  <nettime>  is a moderated mailing list for net criticism,
> #  collaborative text filtering and cultural politics of the nets
> #  more info: http://mx.kein.org/mailman/listinfo/nettime-l
> #  archive: http://www.nettime.org contact: nett...@kein.org
> #  @nettime_bot tweets mail w/ sender unless #ANON is in Subject:
#  distributed via <nettime>: no commercial use without permission
#  <nettime>  is a moderated mailing list for net criticism,
#  collaborative text filtering and cultural politics of the nets
#  more info: http://mx.kein.org/mailman/listinfo/nettime-l
#  archive: http://www.nettime.org contact: nett...@kein.org
#  @nettime_bot tweets mail w/ sender unless #ANON is in Subject:

Reply via email to