Right. Involving 'capitalism' into this is total bs., even an
intentional sabotage - to make it look inevitable (as no one can imagine
alternative for capitalism, surveillance must also be inevitable.)
Motherf*ckers. So many vacuous words just to avoid mentioning
possibility of simple legislation within existing legal frameworks.
On 1/25/19, 10:09, carlo von lynX wrote:
Stop using leftist terminology (which makes Christian Democrats
and other peeps stop paying attention). What we are facing is a
facet of totalitarianism. Surveillance totalitarianism. We just
don't know who's going to be the big dictator at the end
(presuming that ten years into this game it isn't all sorted
out yet), and maybe we will never be told.
# distributed via <nettime>: no commercial use without permission
# <nettime> is a moderated mailing list for net criticism,
# collaborative text filtering and cultural politics of the nets
# more info: http://mx.kein.org/mailman/listinfo/nettime-l
# archive: http://www.nettime.org contact: nett...@kein.org
# @nettime_bot tweets mail w/ sender unless #ANON is in Subject:
