Hello, may I be the grumpy old man here? I am a tad tired to be fascinated by the latest madness that emerges from the intersection of a US technology companies running amok, a US society which i see struggling with deep political, social, economic problems, and the psyche of mostly US citizens, also showing disturbing signs of distress and confusion.
Yes, I agree, on an abstract level, it is fascinating to see congress members and presidents recruiting flat-earthers, non-voters, q anon shamans to carry out a coup, as much it is fascinating to see Musk mobilizing anonymous reddit crowds to do meme investments with an app that makes money by selling the transaction log to wall street firms, but it is also not fascinating, or no more than seeing a sick homeless, drug addict man dying alone on the curbside. Yes, I know, I'm invoking the language of health and sickness, madness and normality here, but i cannot escape the feeling, that we are seeing here is not an instance of a political/economic revolt, or social mobilization, (or as one friend put it, class struggle), but the symptoms of a dysfunctional social/economic order, more akin to the institutionally manufactured opioid epidemic than to the long history of revolutions. And, I would not call the opioid epidemic 'fascinating', the same way I would not call the ADHD epidemic fascinating. I think how we look at such phenomena matters, and, as was the case with trump, it is easy to slip into the sports spectator /commentator position: there is DRAMA! there are STARS! the stakes are HIGH! $$$$! There are teams to CHEER! Maybe. But it is also a deeply, deeply sad thing to watch, requires lots of intellectual, emotional labor to engage with, and ultimately, there is no catharsis, just the tragedy of the reproduction of the causes which produce these symptoms in the first place. :( b.- On Tue, Feb 2, 2021 at 7:19 PM Sam Dwyer <hellosamdw...@gmail.com> wrote: > Two days ago an otherwise sensible friend, a political organizer, > earnestly and then angrily tried to convince me that purchasing stock in > Gamestop was somehow striking a blow against capitalism. > > I was and remain very perplexed at how people could believe such a thing. > ONE WEIRD TRICK THAT BANKS HATE is putting money into your brokerage > account and purchasing stocks? Surely not. This friend then admitted that > people who invested now probably weren't going to make money. "So," I > asked, "by investing now, and letting other people take profits, you are > supporting a movement? Like a heroes relief fund?" Yes. > > This is a particularly dumb front in a just war. > > Given that $GME is presently imploding, with its value down -55% for the > day, I hope there won't be too many casualties amongst the revolutionary > cadres; sacrificed, as they have been so often in the past, in the service > of cynical agendas. At least (to my knowledge) the white supremacists > haven't written thinkpieces portraying their participation in a > get-rich-quick scheme as virtuous. It is also worth mentioning that there > are also no doubt plenty of hedge funds who took the opposite, winning side > of Melvin Capitals crowded short trade. But if they are winning, they are > being smart and not crowing about it. > > The Gamestop Saga will flare out as a cultural scrying glass soon, but > there are many more, and profoundly consequential implications behind > Felix's astute point that this is "*all about money and the recognition, > after a decade of quantitative easing and crypto bubbles, that money is > somehow **meaningless.*" Part of this sensation may be the emotional > experience of inflation, and a changing relationship to money as a > substance, as it continues to physically dematerialize. Part of it may also > be that Americans have now seen how easy it is for the government to flip a > switch and send us a check. > > This last part seems to be popular. > > > > > On Tue, Feb 2, 2021 at 8:54 AM Florian Cramer <flrnc...@gmail.com> wrote: > >> GameStop checks all boxes of 'populism' as it has been defined by >> political scientists Jan-Werner Müller and Cas Mudde, namely as a revolt of >> "the good people" against "the corrupt elites". (I am less sure whether it >> would also check the boxes of populism as defined by Laclau/Mouffe). >> >> As you pointed out, Felix, it's "hard to say" what the politics of >> GameStop are beyond such a diagnosis. Its orchestration on Reddit involved >> white suprematists [ >> https://www.theguardian.com/commentisfree/2021/jan/31/market-is-rigged-in-favour-of-rich-as-gamestop-fiasco-reveals >> ], and it is heavily being pushed in right-extremist Telegram channels. One >> also shouldn't forget that it's the creation of a speculative bubble like >> Bitcoin, albeit a more nihilistic one, and maybe also a (IMHO naive and >> misguided) assumption that stock ownership is 'good' capitalism while short >> selling is toxic capitalism. >> >> -F >> >> >> -- >> blog: *https://pod.thing.org/people/13a6057015b90136f896525400cd8561 >> <https://pod.thing.org/people/13a6057015b90136f896525400cd8561>* >> bio: http://floriancramer.nl >> >> >> On Tue, Feb 2, 2021 at 1:16 PM Felix Stalder <fe...@openflows.com> wrote: >> >>> >>> I find the GameStop saga endlessly fascinating, on so many levels. >>> >>> For one, it's a fitting continuation of the year of American discontent, >>> that started with #BLM, continued with #StopTheSteal, and reached now >>> Wall Street with #Gamestop. Politically, these movements are, of course, >>> very different. The first reacting to deep historical, systemic >>> injustice and violence, the second bought into a political lie and the >>> third one, well, that's hard to say. >>> >>> But all three express, in their own way, a belief, shared by large >>> segments of the population, that "the system" -- the institutions of >>> policing, democracy and the financial system -- are fundamental rigged >>> against them, and that they have to do something against it, even at >>> considerable personal risk. If you followed all three over the year, >>> even only superficially, you got a crash course in institutional >>> critique on an epic scale. >>> >>> Here's pretty good segment from hill.tv, a relatively respectable >>> Washington outlet, that makes pretty much this argument: >>> >>> https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=zTT4it_f7Jc&feature=youtu.be >>> >>> In terms of GameStop, I think a good starting point is to assume that >>> there are predominantly bad-faith actors involved, that everything >>> expressed is part of an agenda, that may, or may not, be in line with >>> what is expressed. Additionally, we are in an environment that is fully >>> artificial, made up of ultimately arbitrary, but consequential rules. If >>> you are a deeply immersed gamer, or belief that we are living in a >>> virtual simulation, as people like Musk apparently do, then you are >>> right at home. >>> >>> That doesn't mean that this is not political. It's a lot of things at >>> the same time. An insider-game between billionaires, a populist revolt, >>> a get-rich-quick-scheme, total market failure, and the free-markets >>> fully functioning. It's ultra cynical and naive, deeply individualistic, >>> and full of expressions of solidarity. It's deadly serious and hugely >>> entertaining. It's all about money and the recognition, after a decade >>> of quantitative easing and crypto bubbles, that money is somehow >>> meaningless. It expresses itself in spreadsheets and memes, and, no >>> doubt, soon also in congressional hearings. >>> >>> While I don't expect this one event to have immediate, dramatic >>> consequences, I expect this to simmer on for a long time and light other >>> fires, in unexpected places. >>> >>> >>> >>> # distributed via <nettime>: no commercial use without permission >>> # <nettime> is a moderated mailing list for net criticism, >>> # collaborative text filtering and cultural politics of the nets >>> # more info: http://mx.kein.org/mailman/listinfo/nettime-l >>> # archive: http://www.nettime.org contact: nett...@kein.org >>> # @nettime_bot tweets mail w/ sender unless #ANON is in Subject: >> >> # distributed via <nettime>: no commercial use without permission >> # <nettime> is a moderated mailing list for net criticism, >> # collaborative text filtering and cultural politics of the nets >> # more info: http://mx.kein.org/mailman/listinfo/nettime-l >> # archive: http://www.nettime.org contact: nett...@kein.org >> # @nettime_bot tweets mail w/ sender unless #ANON is in Subject: > > # distributed via <nettime>: no commercial use without permission > # <nettime> is a moderated mailing list for net criticism, > # collaborative text filtering and cultural politics of the nets > # more info: http://mx.kein.org/mailman/listinfo/nettime-l > # archive: http://www.nettime.org contact: nett...@kein.org > # @nettime_bot tweets mail w/ sender unless #ANON is in Subject:
# distributed via <nettime>: no commercial use without permission # <nettime> is a moderated mailing list for net criticism, # collaborative text filtering and cultural politics of the nets # more info: http://mx.kein.org/mailman/listinfo/nettime-l # archive: http://www.nettime.org contact: nett...@kein.org # @nettime_bot tweets mail w/ sender unless #ANON is in Subject:
