Simon Josefsson <si...@josefsson.org> writes: > Do you think a uint32_t->uint32_t interface would be acceptable?
If that's what is really needed for scrypt (the only application so far), and it lets you avoid converting back and forth between bytes and uint32_t, then it seems like the right thing to do. We may add a function with uint8_t (and little endian convention, I guess) later if the need arises. So we should take that possibility into account when naming the function. Regards, /Niels -- Niels Möller. PGP-encrypted email is preferred. Keyid C0B98E26. Internet email is subject to wholesale government surveillance. _______________________________________________ nettle-bugs mailing list nettle-bugs@lists.lysator.liu.se http://lists.lysator.liu.se/mailman/listinfo/nettle-bugs
