Nikos Mavrogiannopoulos <n...@redhat.com> writes: > If you mean removing them from the public headers and placing them in > one (or multiple) internal ones, it makes sense to me.
Sounds reasonable. Then it's harder to use them without realizing they're internal and not compatible over version changes (even though we ought to document the conventions). >> What do you think? Are there any of the current _nettle_* symbols >> that should be in the advertised API (and hence renamed)? > > I do not use any of them in gnutls, but searching at the debian code, I > see: _nettle_md5_compress (sogo), _nettle_sha1_compress > (filezilla/putty) We could promote those to advertised ABI, then. I.e., linker symbols nettle_*_compress after the ABI change, while we could keep _nettle_*_compress as aliases in the header file, not not also break the API. Regards, /Niels -- Niels Möller. PGP-encrypted email is preferred. Keyid 368C6677. Internet email is subject to wholesale government surveillance. _______________________________________________ nettle-bugs mailing list nettle-bugs@lists.lysator.liu.se http://lists.lysator.liu.se/mailman/listinfo/nettle-bugs
