Maamoun TK <maamoun...@googlemail.com> writes: > To suppress these warnings we need to declare a prototype for > _nettle_gcm_init_key() and _nettle_gcm_hash() if "HAVE_NATIVE_gcm_init_key" > and "HAVE_NATIVE_gcm_hash" are defined respectively.
Could be fixed in the new gcm-internal.h file. (I don't quite like that it needs any ifdefs around the declarations; the reason I had to add that was that I'd like to have the definitions be static in the case that it's all defined in C, and then it conflicts with non-static declarations in this file). > Also, I think an error will pop up in x86_64 build if gcm_hash8 is enabled, > we can fix this error by replacing the line 156 "#define gcm_hash > _nettle_gcm_hash8" with "#define _nettle_gcm_hash _nettle_gcm_hash8" You're right, it's broken on x86_64. > Let me know if you want me to make a pull request for these changes. If you can help out with that, that's much appreciated. Regards, /Niels -- Niels Möller. PGP-encrypted email is preferred. Keyid 368C6677. Internet email is subject to wholesale government surveillance. _______________________________________________ nettle-bugs mailing list nettle-bugs@lists.lysator.liu.se http://lists.lysator.liu.se/mailman/listinfo/nettle-bugs
