> > I wonder which assembly files we should use if target host is aarch64, > but ABI=32? I guess the arm/v6/ code can be used unconditionally. Can > we also use arm/neon/ code unconditionally? >
It seems gcc for aarch64 doesn't support building 32-bit binaries, maybe we should remove the check of ABI since 64-bit is the only option. I tried adding arm/v6 and arm/neon unconditionally, both yield a bunch of errors such as the integer register is r4 instead of w4 or x4 plus getting a few unknown mnemonics. Do you agre with aiming for a release pretty soon, including the new > powerpc64 code, but no aarch64 code? > Isn't starting a new version with both powerpc64 and aarch64 changes is more reasonable? I'm not sure here, if there are a few commits before powerpc64 patches then it makes sense to wrap up the current version with powerpc64 code. It's up to you to decide, you can also consider an AES modes optimizations for S390x arch which I'll drop its patch in the next few days. regards, Mamone _______________________________________________ nettle-bugs mailing list nettle-bugs@lists.lysator.liu.se http://lists.lysator.liu.se/mailman/listinfo/nettle-bugs
