On Thursday 23 July 2009, vinay ವಿನಯ್ wrote: > Gora Mohanty wrote: > > On Wed, 22 Jul 2009 20:59:05 +0530 > > > > vinay ವಿನಯ್ <[email protected]> wrote:
> > The letter is a little confusing, as it says not fully Unicode > > compliant, whereas from other statements in the annexure, it > > seems that the font is completely non-compliant with Unicode. > > Well, the thing is the software has some features where you can conver > the text to unicode. But the thing is, after you convert it to unicode, > you cannot even edit is using the same software. But since they do allow > conversion to unicode, if we say "software does not comply to Unicode at > all", they might say its not true. Conversion to some other format does not in anyway mean that it is compatible to that converted format. You will be 100% right in saying that it "does not comply to unicode specs at all". > -- Rgds JTD _______________________________________________ network mailing list [email protected] http://lists.fosscom.in/listinfo.cgi/network-fosscom.in
