This is a great news. Congrats to all those who worked for it.

Thanks,
Roopesh

On Sun, Nov 14, 2010 at 1:53 PM, Venkatesh Hariharan <
[email protected]> wrote:

> Dear Parminder,
>
> Thanks for the kind words. It was a massive team effort spanning more than
> three years. The real credit goes to those unsung heroes in academia and
> government who toiled really hard behind the scenes. When the key
> discussions were happening, they were the ones who withstood the pressure to
> dilute the policy. I was lucky to have a very visible role because of my
> writing and speaking skills, plus tremendous organizational backing from Red
> Hat, for the last three years.
>
> At a later date, I want to write a more detailed account of the open
> standards battle and the previous OOXML battle to give people in our
> community (and also others involved in policy change in India) how policy
> battles need to be fought and won. In that account, I will try to give due
> credit to all the people involved. Right now, I don't want to single out
> anyone because the focus should be on what we accomplished as a team and
> where we need to go next.
>
> This is a tremendous victory for FOSS in India and a truly defining moment.
> This victory, combined with our victory in keeping software patents out of
> the 2005 Patent Amendment Act means that we have been extremely successful
> in containing two of the biggest threats to FOSS. The tremendous energies
> that we channeled into defending FOSS now needs to be focussed on expanding
> FOSS to every nook and corner of India. Collectively, we will now have to
> demonstrate new levels of maturity, leadership and willingness to engage
> with the political establishment. We must build a new India on the
> principles of open source -- collaboration, transparency, sharing and merit.
> This is FOSS 2.0 for India and a great journey lies ahead of us.
>
> Venky
>
>
>
>
> On Sat, Nov 13, 2010 at 8:47 AM, parminder <[email protected]>wrote:
>
>>  This is great!
>>
>> While many from the civil society were involved in helping shape a
>> progressive open standards in egov policy, and staving off the many strong
>> threats to it, Venky's contribution to this process was singularly
>> outstanding. I have seen few such committed personal efforts in advocacy. He
>> was single-mindedly focussed on 'not what we did' (the bane of much civil
>> society advocacy efforts) but on 'what happened', and 'what more could be
>> done to make more happen'.
>>
>> He not only studiously tracked every step and each movement in the policy
>> making process, at every point he did almost more than what is humanly
>> possible to contact all people who could be of use at the particular moment,
>> kept pursing them relentlessly, and saw to it that the best impact possible
>> of progressive actors was made. One can never fully judge what would have
>> happened if this or that had not been done, but I do consider it very likely
>> that we would not have got the policy in this shape without his efforts. So
>> special personal congratulations to you , Venky. Also to all others who did
>> so much work in this matter. Not much good is happening in India's policy
>> making spaces today, and these few victories feel that much sweeter.
>> Parminder
>>
>> On Friday 12 November 2010 05:26 PM, Venkatesh Hariharan wrote:
>>
>> The open standards policy has been finalized and it incorporates many of
>> the suggestions made by the FOSS community in India. In the previous draft
>> dated 25/11/2009, our major objection was to section 4.1.2 of the policy
>> which said,
>>
>> "4.1.2 The essential patent claims necessary to implement the Identified
>> Standard should preferably be
>> available on a Royalty-Free (no payment and no restrictions) basis for the
>> life time of the standard.
>> However, if such Standards are not found feasible and in the wider public
>> interest, then RF on Fair,
>> Reasonable and Non Discriminatory terms and conditions (FRAND) or
>> Reasonable and Non
>> Discriminatory terms and conditions (RAND) could be considered."
>>
>> Our comment on this section reads:
>>
>> The usage of terms like “preferably” in a section titled, “Mandatory
>> Characteristics”
>> weakens the section and could even render it meaningless. Mandatory
>> characteristics should be laid
>> out clearly and unambiguously,
>>
>> The term “essential patent claims,” is meaningless because a standard
>> cannot be implemented
>> partially. Therefore, the ENTIRE standard should be royalty-free and not
>> just the "essential" parts of it.
>> In other words, ALL patent claims necessary to implement the standard
>> should be royalty-free. Also,
>> RF on FRAND/RAND is self-contradictory. If a Standard is Royalty Free (RF)
>> then it cannot be RAND.
>> Therefore, the wording of this section should be changed to "ALL patent
>> claims necessary to
>> implement the Identified Standard should be available on a Royalty-Free
>> (no payment and no
>> restrictions) basis for the life time of the standard. However, if such
>> Standards are not found feasible
>> and in the wider public interest, then Fair, Reasonable and Non
>> Discriminatory terms and conditions
>> (FRAND) or Reasonable and Non Discriminatory terms and conditions (RAND)
>> could be considered.”
>>
>> As you can see from the extract below, the points mentioned above have
>> been incorporated In the recently finalized policy. This section now reads:
>>
>> 4.1.2 The Patent claims necessary to implement the Identified Standard
>> shall be made available on a Royalty-Free basis for the life time of the
>> Standard.
>>
>> Overall, I'd say this is a major victory for the Indian FOSS community and
>> more than three years of hard work have paid off. The file can be downloaded
>> from:
>>
>> http://egovstandards.gov.in/approved-standthe suggestions
>> mards/egscontent.2010-11-12.9124322046/at_download/file<http://egovstandards.gov.in/approved-standards/egscontent.2010-11-12.9124322046/at_download/file>
>>
>> or from:
>>
>> http://egovstandards.gov.in<http://egovstandards.gov.in/approved-standards/egscontent.2010-11-12.9124322046/at_download/file>(click
>>  on the links on the top left hand side).
>>
>> Venky
>>
>>
>> _______________________________________________
>> network mailing 
>> [email protected]http://lists.fosscom.in/listinfo.cgi/network-fosscom.in
>>
>>
>> _______________________________________________
>> network mailing list
>> [email protected]
>> http://lists.fosscom.in/listinfo.cgi/network-fosscom.in
>>
>>
>
> _______________________________________________
> network mailing list
> [email protected]
> http://lists.fosscom.in/listinfo.cgi/network-fosscom.in
>
>
_______________________________________________
network mailing list
[email protected]
http://lists.fosscom.in/listinfo.cgi/network-fosscom.in

Reply via email to