> > I don't think it's as black-and-white as you're trying to make it.  There
 > > are pros and cons to both models.  I hope I've pointed out some of the
 > > reasons why we're proposing having dedicated commands. 
 > 
 > Maybe I just don't want to have to type it -- of course, NWAM will save
 > me that trouble, and since NWAM will be the primary user of dladm's wifi
 > support maybe I shouldn't care.

Yes -- or netprof, inetmenu, ...

 > But I still don't see the need for the -wifi suffix.

No matter what, we'd have a suffix (it would be -link for the model you
propose) -- all existing dladm subcommands are verb-noun, and consistency
dictates that we follow suit.

-- 
meem
_______________________________________________
networking-discuss mailing list
[email protected]

Reply via email to