James Carlson wrote:
[EMAIL PROTECTED] writes:
Further, dladm already exists now and has yet another usage model; it
seems reasonable to me to extend it further to support an established
I know; it's mostly water under the bridge. I just found the
consistency argument with zfs to be a bit flawed.
So it sounds like there is no good reason to prefer -v in place of '-o all'.
Given that the command line syntax is much more of the expanded command
style of ZFS, it would be self-consistent to use '-o all'.
Darren
_______________________________________________
networking-discuss mailing list
[email protected]
