> If/when interfaces such as these and others want to get into the > DDI, are we required to rename them to something starting with > "ddi" ? e.g. mac_alloc() -> ddi_mac_alloc()
No, that's just a convention. If the interfaces are already in contracted use or have otherwise escaped from ON, it's common to just put them in the DDI as-is. The section 9F manpage will indicate the DDI specifics. > What is the process for transitioning something to be a part of > the DDI? PSARC -- e.g., see 2003/648 for the case that moved the <sys/strsun.h> routines into the DDI. -- meem _______________________________________________ networking-discuss mailing list [email protected]
