> So does the VLAN Tagging get rid of the "problems" of binding the the > physical interface?
Sorry, I don't follow. Could you say more? > I have tested the VLAN Tagging using probe based detection in S9, and it > works fine with the test addresses on the vlan interface, although I have > not come across an app I have tested yet that binds to the adapter like > bootparamd does per the blueprints (I don't think bootparamd would like a > VLAN interface anyway). However because of the way the sun blueprints and > other sunsolve docs implement the data address against one of the physical > interfaces, we are questioning whether the VLAN Tagging masks the situation > and makes the clean configuration with both test addresses on the vlan > interfaces with the data on the vlan-sub-interface a viable option. I also > want to move away from active-standby configuration and use it in > active-active. > > Is any of the IPMP re-architecture work done in nevada at this time? At this point, only very basic functionality is working in my development workspace. It will probably go back to Solaris 11 a single putback, so integration is some time away. I cannot comment too much on internal schedules, but rest assured that once we have bits that are worthy of external experimentation, we will provide early access. -- meem _______________________________________________ networking-discuss mailing list [email protected]
