On Fri, 2006-07-14 at 16:20 +0800, Darren Reed wrote: > Peter Memishian wrote: > > > For the project document...in the introduction, the following is written: > > > > > > "The Clearview (PSARC/2005/132) project will be introducing new > > > features that require an extensible way to open DLPI links under > > > different directories. Currently, DLPI applications accessing data > > > links assume DLPI filesystem nodes are under /dev and use open() to > > > directly access such DLPI links. With Clearview's introduction of > > > vanity naming, this assumption above will create a problem because all > > > vanity-named DLPI nodes will be placed under a /dev/net directory. > > > This libdlpi library proposes an interface, dlpi_open(), which will > > > provide an abstraction around this so that DLPI applications do not > > > need to know where the actual DLPI link is located in the filesystem." > > > > > > Depending on your point of view, nodes under /dev/net are still > > > under /dev, just an extra directory removed. > > > >OK, we'll add the word "directly" before "under /dev". > > > > Some replacement of "which" with "that" would also be good.
I've made the changes and replaced "which" with "that" where appropriate. thank you for the suggestions. Updated versions of the libdlpi API manpages and PSARC proposal have been posted to: http://www.opensolaris.org/os/project/clearview/libdlpi/ Thanks, Sagun _______________________________________________ networking-discuss mailing list [email protected]
