Ben,
Ben Rockwood wrote:
Nicolas Droux wrote:
Let me know you have further questions.
Nicolas, I had one follow up question.
Is there anything wrong with creating an Aggr with only a single
interface in it? In essence, using Aggregations as an interface
abstraction layer?
The idea is this: when creating a zone that may exist on one or more
systems with differing network configurations to use an aggregate with a
single device so that regardless of the actual underlying network you
can still use interface aggr1, for instance. When Crossbow integrates I
doubt this will be necessary, but in the meantime it could provide a
useful flexibility provided it doesn't cause network errors.
Yes, it should work.
Crossbow will provide an other way to create multiple VNICs on devices
and assign them to zones.
As meem pointed out in a separate email, Clearview vanity naming will
allow you to assign different names than "vnic<i>" or "aggr<i>" to the
resulting data-links for even more flexibility.
Nicolas.
--
Nicolas Droux - Solaris Networking - Sun Microsystems, Inc.
[EMAIL PROTECTED] - http://blogs.sun.com/droux
_______________________________________________
networking-discuss mailing list
[email protected]
