Peter Memishian wrote: > > > True, though most of us would've winced if we saw code doing that sort of > > > mapping even prior to SCTP -- it's inherently fragile and defeats the > > > intended abstraction. > > > > Sure. But given that we never bothered to provide a proper interface > > to retrieve this sort of information, what was a programmer working on > > deadline to do? :-/ > > For an OpenSolaris developer, I'd hope they'd minimally file an RFE > requesting SO_PROTOTYPE :-)
Did anyone filed such a RFE yet ? If not then I'll do it. ksh93 just got IPv6 support (with ast-ksh.20061222 ; see http://mail.opensolaris.org/pipermail/ksh93-integration-discuss/2006-December/001989.html) and now I am playing around with the SCTP "easter egg" in the shell... ---- Bye, Roland -- __ . . __ (o.\ \/ /.o) [EMAIL PROTECTED] \__\/\/__/ MPEG specialist, C&&JAVA&&Sun&&Unix programmer /O /==\ O\ TEL +49 641 7950090 (;O/ \/ \O;) _______________________________________________ networking-discuss mailing list [email protected]
