Hi All, The following bug description doc says it has been reported against s10u2_09. Can any one kindly confirm that this bug is not present in earlier release/updates of Solaris 10. http://bugs.opensolaris.org/view_bug.do?bug_id=6440338
Regards, Laxmi Exact Solutions ( India ) Pvt. Ltd. Phone # 91-22-56311764/ 65 Laxmi Prasad Botla: [EMAIL PROTECTED] <mailto:Laxmi Prasad Botla: [EMAIL PROTECTED]> CONFIDENTIAL *** CONFIDENTIAL ** CONFIDENTIAL ** CONFIDENTIAL **CONFIDENTIAL THIS DATA IS STRICTLY CONFIDENTIAL TRADE SECRET INFORMATION, INTENDED FOR A SPECIFIC INDIVIDUAL AND PURPOSE AND IS PROTECTED BY LAW. THE RECIPIENT AGREES TO MAINTAIN STRICT CONFIDENTIALITY CONCERNING THIS INFORMATION AND AGREES TO MAINTAIN STRICT SECURITY SAFEGUARDS AGAINST UNAUTHORIZED ACCESS, USE, OR DISCLOSURE. YOU ARE NOTIFIED THAT ANY UNAUTHORIZED COPYING, DISCLOSURE OR DISTRIBUTION OF THIS DATA IN ANY TYPE WHATSOEVER, INCLUDING IN READABLE OR ENCRYPTED FORM, OR IN INDIVIDUALLY IDENTIFIABLE OR AGGREGATE FORM IS STRICTLY PROHIBITED. -----Original Message----- From: Philip Kirk - Solaris Sustaining [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Sent: Tuesday, October 10, 2006 7:13 PM To: Laxmi Prasad Botla Cc: [email protected] Subject: Re: [networking-discuss] Capturing loopback traffic Hi Laxmi, >could you please suggest if there is any alternative approach to >support Loop back in current release of Solaris 10 (with out ipnet and pf >hooks). Previously I replied to this mail and said I couldn't think of any easy supported way to do this. However, in conversation with some colleagues we were discussing whether it might be possible to do this by pushing a module above TCP. I don't think this is necesarily an easy approach, there might well be issues depending on what you actually need and there would probably be a performance hit but it might be worth investigating. Phil _______________________________________________ networking-discuss mailing list [email protected]
