Ed:
Do you mean INIT, COOKIE_ECHO etc. are sent to 218.40.33.101? if so... I suppose this could be some sort of loadbalancing (or similar) setup where 218.40.33.101 is the virtual address on a server along with 192.168.13.101, which is the physical interface with which the server communicates to the client. Bob had sent another mail about this problem with some more details, maybe he can add to this. If I misunderstood your question, let me know.. -venu On Thu, 22 Feb 2007, Edgar Angelo V. Duro wrote:
Just a question related to the attached ethereal capture. How was it made possible to send SCTP chunks such as INIT_ACK, COOKIE_ACK etc. from 192.168.13.101 to 218.40.33.122 when the INIT, COOKIE_ECHO chuck and etc. are sent to 219.40.33.122 ? Thanks, Ed This message posted from opensolaris.org _______________________________________________ networking-discuss mailing list [email protected]
_______________________________________________ networking-discuss mailing list [email protected]
