I find that the extra late responses are just duplicated response, the 4893 response has been received, but later, got another 4893 response. Ping requests were sent from Solaris server using my network driver, target (192.168.0.10) is a Linux PC runs Fedora. I am wondering why. Is using ping a good method to test the reliability of a network driver?
#ping -s 192.168.0.10 .......................... 64 bytes from 192.168.0.10: icmp_seq=4883. time=1.117 ms 64 bytes from 192.168.0.10: icmp_seq=4884. time=2.104 ms 64 bytes from 192.168.0.10: icmp_seq=4398. time=487001.253 ms 64 bytes from 192.168.0.10: icmp_seq=4885. time=1002.414 ms 64 bytes from 192.168.0.10: icmp_seq=4887. time=0.884 ms 64 bytes from 192.168.0.10: icmp_seq=4888. time=2.148 ms 64 bytes from 192.168.0.10: icmp_seq=4889. time=1.131 ms 64 bytes from 192.168.0.10: icmp_seq=4890. time=2.253 ms 64 bytes from 192.168.0.10: icmp_seq=4891. time=1.257 ms 64 bytes from 192.168.0.10: icmp_seq=4892. time=2.052 ms 64 bytes from 192.168.0.10: icmp_seq=[b]4893[/b]. time=1.054 ms 64 bytes from 192.168.0.10: icmp_seq=4894. time=0.839 ms 64 bytes from 192.168.0.10: icmp_seq=4895. time=2.217 ms 64 bytes from 192.168.0.10: icmp_seq=4896. time=2.092 ms 64 bytes from 192.168.0.10: icmp_seq=4897. time=1.185 ms 64 bytes from 192.168.0.10: icmp_seq=4898. time=2.355 ms 64 bytes from 192.168.0.10: icmp_seq=4899. time=2.548 ms 64 bytes from 192.168.0.10: icmp_seq=4900. time=1.138 ms .................... 64 bytes from 192.168.0.10: icmp_seq=5374. time=2.086 ms 64 bytes from 192.168.0.10: icmp_seq=5375. time=0.850 ms 64 bytes from 192.168.0.10: icmp_seq=5376. time=2.066 ms 64 bytes from 192.168.0.10: icmp_seq=5377. time=1.090 ms 64 bytes from 192.168.0.10: icmp_seq=[b]4893[/b]. time=485001.980 ms 64 bytes from 192.168.0.10: icmp_seq=5379. time=0.909 ms 64 bytes from 192.168.0.10: icmp_seq=5380. time=1.330 ms ^C ----192.168.0.10 PING Statistics---- 5381 packets transmitted, 5350 packets received, 0% packet loss round-trip (ms) min/avg/max/stddev = 0.678/14955.496/499002.282/12148.439 This message posted from opensolaris.org _______________________________________________ networking-discuss mailing list [EMAIL PROTECTED]
