> I'd like to have folks review the work at > http://cr.grommit.com/~gdamore/dmfe_gldv3/webrev > > * This will make dmfe a DLPI style 1 provider as well. (A good > thing, IMO, DLPI style 2 is a "bug".)
Yes. FWIW, all the Clearview /dev/net nodes are DLPI style-1 *only*. Since those will be what applications interact with in the future, we're on our way to getting rid of "style-2 disease". > * I'd love to replace the dmfe-custom loopback ioctls with standards > sys/netlb.h ioctls. However, I'm not sure if any consumers are going to > be impacted. IIRC, switching to sys/netlb.h would allow SunVTS coverage. -- meem _______________________________________________ networking-discuss mailing list [email protected]
