James Carlson wrote:
Would it be good for us to retain them somehow in early phase of Brussel,
like by ways of keep it as "private" properties? For backward compatibility
reason, some customers might rely on those private properties in their
production env. Before we provide enough tuning in framework, they will
lose nothing.
I like Raymond's proposal..
I'd rather see those things left behind whereever they are -- ndd,
driver.conf -- and left out of Brussels user interfaces, with bugs
filed to have them removed completely over time.
So whether or not to keep those things is not a problem, the problem is
where we keep them in Brussel?
_______________________________________________
networking-discuss mailing list
[email protected]
