James Carlson wrote: >... >I'm really quite disappointed that a project proposal like this would >meet with such opposition. >
The opposition I have is the name it is being given, which isn't in line with what is being delivered/proposed. If one or the other can be changed, I'd be happy. >Maybe what one of the senior folks >commenting on this said was right -- that we shouldn't bother with the >overhead involved in doing this on OpenSolaris, and should just cook >up the documents on the SWAN, because we need them now, and the >argument and delay required to get them going is not worth it. > > Isn't that always the case? Doesn't less bureaucracy always result in things being easier to deliver? Darren _______________________________________________ networking-discuss mailing list [email protected]
