> > hme.c:4035 - Is there a specific reason why the conditional specifically
 > > uses a != 0 rather than just 'hmep->hme_flags & HMESUSPENDED'? I thought
 > > this looked a little out of place since other conditionals in hme.c do not
 > > seem to follow this behavior.
 > >   
 > 
 > Actually, I think a few other places I also used != 0.  Although 
 > compilers evaluate it the same way, I prefer to make comparison against 
 > zero explicit.  I thought at one point I'd even seen a style guide 
 > recommending or requiring this.

Really?  I don't recall anything about that.

--
meem
_______________________________________________
networking-discuss mailing list
[email protected]

Reply via email to