On Mar 20, 2008, at 12:28 AM, Kevin Zupan wrote: > Can anyone tell me why, rpcbind not only binds to udp/111, but also > to some other random udp port above 32770. I can find lots of > information about this be a vulnerability and this and that, but I > really cannot find any information as to the functional reason for > this.
I don't see any evidence of this in the source for rpcbind. It will bind to all of the available transports but should be limited to port 111. Do you have additional information on this behavior? Spencer _______________________________________________ networking-discuss mailing list [email protected]
