From a cursory look, only two threads stand out:

ffffff003d30bc80 fffffffffbc238f0                0   0 100                0
   PC: panic_idle+0x23    THREAD: unix`thread_create_intr()
   stack pointer for thread ffffff003d30bc80: ffffff003d30b7a0
     ntv_rdmsr_xc+0x81()
     call_func_ntv+0xb6()
     1()
     tsc_read+3()
     gethrtime+0xd()
     drv_usecwait+0x98()
     nge_check_copper+0x10a()
     nge_factotum_link_check+0x23()
     nge_chip_factotum+0x7a()
     av_dispatch_softvect+0x5f()
     dispatch_softint+0x34()
     switch_sp_and_call+0x13()
     dosoftint+0x59()
     do_interrupt+0x108()
     _interrupt+0xba()
     fakesoftint_return()
     disp_lock_exit_nopreempt+0x44()
     cv_wait+0x54()
     taskq_thread+0x157()
     thread_start+8()

ffffff003d5d5c80 fffffffffbc238f0                0   0 105                0
   PC: panic_idle+0x23    THREAD: unix`thread_create_intr()
   stack pointer for thread ffffff003d5d5c80: ffffff003d5d5900
     6()
     bcopy+0xa()
     nge_receive+0x1a()
     nge_intr_handle+0x119()
     nge_chip_intr+0x7e()
     av_dispatch_autovect+0x78()
     dispatch_hardint+0x2f()
     switch_sp_and_call+0x13()
     do_interrupt+0xa0()
     _interrupt+0xba()
     dispatch_softint+0x27()
     switch_sp_and_call+0x13()
     dosoftint+0x59()
     do_interrupt+0xfe()
     _interrupt+0xba()
     mach_cpu_idle+0x17()
     cpu_idle+0xc8()
     idle+0x10e()
     thread_start+8()

Both are handling nxge interrupts. Neither seems to be blocked:

- the first one is in the busy wait loop, probably in nge_mii_access() 
(not shown due to tail call optimization), 30 attempts max 10 usec each;

- the second one is bcopying  some data;

Are you sure the boot process really hangs or is just very slow? There's 
a bunch of nxge instances (12?) which might take a while to complete 
net-physical. On a live system under kmdb, it would make sense to 
capture threadlist several times and see if it changes over time.

-Artem
_______________________________________________
networking-discuss mailing list
[email protected]

Reply via email to