James, I'm going through the feedback you provided in idm_so.c. I've played with the code that skips loopback address while determining local interfaces and I see an entry named "lo0" that does not have the IFF_LOOPBACK flag set in the control structure. I was wondering if we could keep our same algorithm for now of matching the name "lo0" while filing an RFE to investigate this further. The current code was taken from the user mode target driver.
thanks, -jim On 09/22/08 11:16, James Carlson wrote: > > idm_so.c: > > ... > > 52: why is this necessary? Does comparing by name even work > reliably? Doesn't the existing IFF_LOOPBACK or perhaps > INADDR_LOOPBACK tell you what you need to know? > > _______________________________________________ networking-discuss mailing list [email protected]
