> FYI, Some people take version numbers to be x.y where y is *not* a true > decimal number. SCCS takes just such an approach. So does SunOS > itself. Back when we had 5.1 we called it 5.1, not 5.01. > > So 1.10 != 1.1. (one dot ten versus one dot one.) > > And 1.2 is *not* newer than 1.10. > > I actually think this is better than trying to use 1.01. Else you wind > up with the same situation after 99 revisions. (What do you call it, > 1.100 ? Or does it force 2.0?) > > -- Garrett
Here's a suggestion for avoiding the confusion between a sequence of integers and a floating point style number: Just drop the initial "1." part, and use an integer as the version number. If we did that, I guess the next one for bge would be "73". Do you like that better? Gordon _______________________________________________ networking-discuss mailing list [email protected]
