Hello Min, I did a quick tests and it seems that snv_97 does not have this problem but snv_98 does.
snv_97 did not lose any of 600 ICMP packages while snv_98 loses 1-5%. I have had limited time to try this today, I can probably do some more tests tomorrow. Regards Henrik On Dec 17, 2008, at 5:06 AM, Min Miles Xu wrote: > Hi Henrik, > Thanks for the information. I notice you are also using 82541. The > issue sounds like a chip specific one. > I just reviewed all the recent putbacked CR before snv_104 of e1000g. > > 6713032 e1000g port hang, no xmit, no recv > 6767201 e1000g default_mtu does not coincide with > max_frame_size on some chipsets when set via e1000g.conf > PSARC 2008/608 brussels property permissions > 6723890 ndd interface donesn't report properties' read/write > capacities correctly after CR 6667363 > > was put back in snv_104, which should have no impact to 82541. > > 6727113 e1000g performance regression is observed with large > connection and packet size if LSO is enabled > 6756917 LSO is not enabled on some e1000g chips > > was put back in snv_103, which should have no impact to 82541. > > 6644298 some DLPI test cases fail in DomU when trying to > receive in promiscuous and/or multicast mode > PSARC 2008/382 Fast Reboot > 6714038 Fast Reboot support for x86 platforms > > was put back in snv_100. > > 6666998 Add support for ICH10 in e1000g driver > 6709230 Requesting driver support in e1000g for new Intel(R) > single port MAC/PHY NIC > > was put back in snv_99. > > 6705005 e1000g LINK/ACT LED behaviour is not consistent with > the EEPROM default > 6738552 e1000g rx_lock is not initialized and destroyed in the > code > 6634746 e1000g is missing lint target in Makefile > > was put back in snv_98. > > Since I don't have such type of chip on hand, could you do me a > favor to identify in which version the problem started to emerge? > > > Thanks, > > Miles Xu > > Henrik Johansson wrote: >> Greetings , >> >> I have the same problem with the same type of adapter in SNV_104. >> Transfers are terrible slow and I am seeing 2-6 percent packet >> loss with ping. The same setup works fine if I switch to a >> Cassini interface and I even tried booting a different os from a >> live-CD to confirm that the NIC hardware was working. >> >> I have also tried to disable both hardware checksum and lso >> without any better results. I can also confirm that this only >> occurs when running gigabit speed, if I force it to 100MBit or use >> a 100MBit switch it works fine. >> >> Adapter PWLA8391GT: >> # prtconf -vpPD | grep "pciclass,0200" |grep 8086 >> compatible: 'pci8086,107c.8086.1376.5' + >> 'pci8086,107c.8086.1376' + 'pci8086,1376' + 'pci8086,107c.5' + >> 'pci8086,107c' + 'pciclass,020000' + 'pciclass,0200' >> >> Regards >> Henrik >> >> On Dec 16, 2008, at 2:38 PM, Min Miles Xu wrote: >> >> >>> Hi Dedhi, >>> LSO issue was fixed in Build 103. Just for confirmation, you >>> meant that >>> the issue still persisted when LSO was disabled, right? (It only >>> affects >>> host golf(Intel 82572). Charlie(Intel 82541) doesn't support LSO) >>> First could you identify the issue was on golf or charlie? I got a >>> separate report complaining 82541 was suffering performance >>> problem in >>> Build 103. >>> >>> Regards, >>> >>> Miles Xu >>> >>> >>> Dedhi Sujatmiko wrote: >>> >>>> Ted You wrote: >>>> >>>>> Hi Dedhi, >>>>> >>>>> Could you please let us know the device id of the e1000g NIC on >>>>> your >>>>> system? You can get it with the following command: >>>>> >>>>> % prtconf -vpPD | grep "pciclass,0200" >>>>> >>>>> >>>> Hi Ted, >>>> >>>> at host charlie : >>>> >>>> r...@charlie # prtconf -vpPD | grep "pciclass,0200" >>>> compatible: 'pci8086,1229.8086.1.2' + >>>> 'pci8086,1229.8086.1' + 'pci8086,1' + 'pci8086,1229.2' + >>>> 'pci8086,1229' + 'pciclass,020000' + 'pciclass,0200' >>>> compatible: 'pci8086,107c.8086.1376.5' + >>>> 'pci8086,107c.8086.1376' + 'pci8086,1376' + 'pci8086,107c.5' + >>>> 'pci8086,107c' + 'pciclass,020000' + 'pciclass,0200' >>>> >>>> It is : http://www.newegg.com/Product/Product.aspx?Item=N82E16833106121 >>>> Intel PWLA8391GT 10/ 100/ 1000Mbps PCI PRO/1000 GT Desktop >>>> Adapter 1 x >>>> RJ45 - OEM >>>> >>>> >>>> at host golf : >>>> >>>> bash-3.2# prtconf -vpPD | grep "pciclass,0200" >>>> compatible: 'pciex8086,10b9.8086.1083.6' + >>>> 'pciex8086,10b9.8086.1083' + 'pciex8086,10b9.6' + >>>> 'pciex8086,10b9' + >>>> 'pciexclass,020000' + 'pciexclass,0200' + >>>> 'pci8086,10b9.8086.1083.6' + >>>> 'pci8086,10b9.8086.1083' + 'pci8086,1083' + 'pci8086,10b9.6' + >>>> 'pci8086,10b9' + 'pciclass,020000' + 'pciclass,0200' >>>> compatible: 'pciex10ec,8168.1458.e000.2' + >>>> 'pciex10ec,8168.1458.e000' + 'pciex10ec,8168.2' + 'pciex10ec, >>>> 8168' + >>>> 'pciexclass,020000' + 'pciexclass,0200' + 'pci10ec, >>>> 8168.1458.e000.2' + >>>> 'pci10ec,8168.1458.e000' + 'pci1458,e000' + 'pci10ec,8168.2' + >>>> 'pci10ec,8168' + 'pciclass,020000' + 'pciclass,0200' >>>> compatible: 'pci8086,1229.1' + 'pci8086,1229' + >>>> 'pciclass,020000' + 'pciclass,0200' >>>> bash-3.2# >>>> >>>> It is : http://www.newegg.com/Product/Product.aspx?Item=N82E16833106033 >>>> Intel EXPI9301CTBLK 10/ 100/ 1000Mbps PCI-Express Network Adapter >>>> 1 x >>>> RJ45 - Retail >>>> >>>> best regards, >>>> >>>> Dedhi >>>> >>> _______________________________________________ >>> networking-discuss mailing list >>> [email protected] >>> >> >> Henrik Johansson >> http://sparcv9.blogspot.com >> >> >> >> _______________________________________________ >> networking-discuss mailing list >> [email protected] >> Henrik Johansson http://sparcv9.blogspot.com _______________________________________________ networking-discuss mailing list [email protected]
