On (04/20/09 13:09), Peter Memishian wrote: > > Since this is analogous to the dhcp "renew-lease" for static addresses, > > we can have a renew-* set of commands for the addreses to reverify > > the address. > > Calling that "renew" seems confusing. It's also worth considering what
We could call it "refresh", if that's better. > such a DAD mechanism would look like if you had the ability to bring > addresses down/up with ipadm. (I haven't looked at the latest design > document, so apologies if it covers this). Not sure what you have in mind, but one of Erik's comments was that we should move away from the model of bringing addresses up/down (and instead focus on bringing the interface up/down) based on the assertion that if an address is undesirable, it should be deleted, not downed. --Sowmini _______________________________________________ networking-discuss mailing list [email protected]
