> It looks to me, after looking at the code, that this particular > distinction is rather arbitrary. I think when you move dls into mac, > its going to look even *more* arbitrary. My strong recommendation would > be to just consolidate all four of these into a single mac module.
There's value in keeping softmac separate if we finish the job of moving the softmac parts that are used by every datalink to mac/dls so that softmac will only be loaded if there's a need to tie in a legacy DLPI driver with GLDv3. That was the original intent of the softmac design, but it was never quite realized. -- meem _______________________________________________ networking-discuss mailing list [email protected]
