Darren Reed wrote: > James Carlson wrote: >> ... >> but a question: I haven't been paying much attention to how >> things have changed over the past few years, so could you summarize the >> story for Shim6 versus PI addresses? >> >> It's certainly good that there's progress, but if it turns out to be >> another Mobile IP ... > > It does feel like it, doesn't it?
To someone who hasn't been keeping track of this, it sounds a bit like a warmed-over MIPv6 CN function adapted for a new kind of "mobility," which is why I asked for clarification. I expect I've missed something about the group consensus, and that RFC 1925 #11 hasn't come to roost. ;-} -- James Carlson 42.703N 71.076W <[email protected]> _______________________________________________ networking-discuss mailing list [email protected]
