OK - the 100%-loss is explained since the packets are coming thru an 
ipsec-vpn-tunnel and while experimenting, I disallowed udp 500 and 
esp-packets...Sorry for the confusion.

Now this is corrected, but I still have the effect of the massive packet loss 
in cycles - regardless if I have nat activated or not.


Cheers,
Kai



-----Ursprüngliche Nachricht-----
Von: [email protected] 
[mailto:[email protected]] Im Auftrag von Kai Krebber
Gesendet: Montag, 10. Mai 2010 09:54
An: [email protected]
Betreff: Re: [networking-discuss] ipfilter passes only 15% of the packets

Sorry - forgot to mention: I'm using the latest stable Version 2009.06.


-----Ursprüngliche Nachricht-----
Von: [email protected] 
[mailto:[email protected]] Im Auftrag von Kai Krebber
Gesendet: Montag, 10. Mai 2010 09:51
An: [email protected]
Betreff: [networking-discuss] ipfilter passes only 15% of the packets

Hi!

I just started with ipfilter on opensolaris. I'm experiencing a (IMHO)
strange behaviour:
I am using Opensolaris as filtering router and for testing allowing
traffic to a particular system:


r...@kunde003-wan:/etc/ipf# ipfstat -io
empty list for ipfilter(out)
pass in log quick on wan3001 from 213.172.123.138/32 to 213.172.115.4/32
pass in log quick on wan3001 from 120.0.0.0/24 to 213.172.115.4/32

In conjunction with Nat, I can see about 14-15 icmp echo requests from
120.0.0.33 hitting 213.172.115.4 and then the next about 34-37 icmp echo
requests get dropped by Opensolaris (the cycle repeats permanently with
slightly varying numbers).

Out of curiosity, I commented out the NAT rule and refreshed ipfilter.
Now, no packets get routed to the target at all.
I then re-enabled the nat rule and refreshed ipfilter. Still - no
packets get routed to the target.


What is causing this inconsistent behavior and how can I stabilize the
functionality?

Cheers,
Kai
_______________________________________________
networking-discuss mailing list
[email protected]
_______________________________________________
networking-discuss mailing list
[email protected]
_______________________________________________
networking-discuss mailing list
[email protected]

Reply via email to