On Thu, 2005-06-16 at 21:50 -0400, Bryan Clark wrote: > So that was definitely done purposefully, here's why. :-) We didn't use > a disabled menu item because those are reserved for items that will > _eventually_ become enabled. In your menus the items are either > enabled, disabled with a possibility of becoming enabled, or not there > at all. Since the 'Wireless Networks' item never actually becomes > enabled we opted to leave it normal. Opposite is the 'Wired Network' > menu which does become enabled when you have a wired connection, and > thus we felt a disabled item was perfect for that. To make the Wireless > Network item stand out as "something you won't be clicking on", we > centered it. The centering also gives a header style look to it that I > think works.
So you disagree with the greying-out, the centering, and the horizontal separator? It seems to me that we are already breaking rules--having a menu item that is never selectable and is actually just a heading. I guess I don't think that the greying-out confuses users as much as the non-greyed-out-centered label is non-stetic. ;-) Robert Love _______________________________________________ NetworkManager-list mailing list NetworkManager-list@gnome.org http://mail.gnome.org/mailman/listinfo/networkmanager-list