T Sureshkumar wrote: > hey, > > This patch is a sequel to the one which I have posted on 9th Jan > 2006. This new patch consists of novellvpn service to connect to IPSec > Gateways, which are configured to authenticate using standard mode with
If it is a standard IPSec client why not call it by it's real name (ipsec)? Novell VPN suggested to me that they are doing some "fancy" stuff like Cisco which makes them incompatible to the rest of the world. But if it is standard IPSec there are quite a variety of gateways we will be able to connect to, for instance something simple as an OpenWRT box with OpenSWAN. Is there an option of naming this neutrally to keep marketing warfare out and to suggest to people that this is what they need if they want to connect to a plain IPSec gateway by the package name already!? Cisco just has a big stake with their XAuth draft so they already stamped it "Cisco VPN" but I don't see that there are 90% Novell machines serving plain IPSec. Don't get me wrong, I really like your efforts, and I like Novell for letting you doing so, but we should keep being the technical guys, not the marketing ones. Tim -- Tim Niemueller <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> www.niemueller.de ================================================================= Imagination is more important than knowledge. (Albert Einstein) _______________________________________________ NetworkManager-list mailing list NetworkManager-list@gnome.org http://mail.gnome.org/mailman/listinfo/networkmanager-list