Dan Williams <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes: >> Oh, it isn't? Hmm... Then what does that mean for a VPN situation? >> When I VPNC into my corporate net I need to use the corporate DNS servers. >> If I'm using named..... How would this work right now? > > If you start a VPN, all DNS traffic is funneled to the corporate > nameservers that the VPN reports back to NM. If split DNS were running, > you'd only use the corporate nameservers for addresses ending in the > corporate domain name that the VPN provided, or ones you specified in > the VPN config, instead of everything. Think of it like the split > routing that we've already got.
Fair enough. I guess I can wait until this gets integrated in. I thought it had already, but I guess not. Oh well. A local caching nameserver is "better", anyways. > Dan -derek -- Derek Atkins, SB '93 MIT EE, SM '95 MIT Media Laboratory Member, MIT Student Information Processing Board (SIPB) URL: http://web.mit.edu/warlord/ PP-ASEL-IA N1NWH [EMAIL PROTECTED] PGP key available _______________________________________________ NetworkManager-list mailing list NetworkManager-list@gnome.org http://mail.gnome.org/mailman/listinfo/networkmanager-list