"Thiago Bauermann" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes: > 2006/8/15, Dan Williams <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>: > >> On Tue, 2006-08-15 at 12:56 -0400, Darren Albers wrote: >>> Mmm Dan/Robert is NM using ap_scan=1 or 2? >> Depends on the distro-specific package, some patch them. But in >> general, we'd like to use _2_ everywhere to force wpa_supplicant to do >> what _we_ want, rather than trying to be too clever on its own. > > Mmm.... in supplicant_send_network_config() there's the following excerpt: > > /* Use "AP_SCAN 2" if: > * - The wireless network is non-broadcast or Ad-Hoc > * - The wireless driver does not support WPA (stupid drivers...) > */ > is_adhoc = (nm_ap_get_mode(ap) == IW_MODE_ADHOC); > if (!nm_ap_get_broadcast (ap) || is_adhoc || !supports_wpa) > ap_scan = "AP_SCAN 2"; > > For all other cases NM seems to be using ap_scan = 1. Is there a > reason why ap_scan = 2 is not used more extensively, then?
Does it make a difference, since wpa_supplicant seems to work just as well for me regardless of ap_scan's value? -- Dave Abrahams Boost Consulting www.boost-consulting.com _______________________________________________ NetworkManager-list mailing list [email protected] http://mail.gnome.org/mailman/listinfo/networkmanager-list
