On 9/28/06, Pat Suwalski <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > Derek Broughton wrote: > > You have a different definition of "apparent" than I do :-( > > It literally shows everything it does, is what "apparent" means to me.
Dumping everything it does, doesn't make a program's actions _apparent_. It leads to confusion without enlightenment. > wpa_supplicant handles unencrypted networks too. If NetworkManager > didn't use it, it would have to use some other interface to connect to > open networks. This way, everything is handled the same way, leaving > less chance for error. Except that I actually _get_ data on that network until wpa_supplicant gets into the act, so it manages to bring up an interface without wpa_supplicant in the first place. > Sounds like scanning is broken on your driver. I know the feeling. Except that it was never a problem with early versions of network manager - it _could be the driver, as it's just using the in-kernel ipw2200, and I update kernels regularly, but I doubt it. I used NM successfully for about a year. I actually think it has developed a hardware problem, but I can get the interface to work (sometimes) using manual ifup/ifdown commands and not with NM. -- derek _______________________________________________ NetworkManager-list mailing list [email protected] http://mail.gnome.org/mailman/listinfo/networkmanager-list
