Tomas, that is an Ubuntu specific issue.
On 6/11/07, Tomáš Hnyk <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > On Sun, 10 Jun 2007 01:46:15 +0200, Dan Williams <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > > > On Sat, 2007-06-09 at 18:03 -0400, steve wrote: > >> Hi, > >> > >> Just a quick post to inform anyone who cares, that I've finished my > >> employment transition, re-created my development environment and I've > >> re-started work on the openswan vpn plugin. > >> > >> I've made two design changes to allow for multiple concurrent vpn > >> connections (in future releases) as it will be required for my new job. > >> I'll post again when I've got a tar ball for others to test. > > > > Awesome! You might want to look at an email recently sent about a new > > API for VPNs to see if it would also work for openswan. > > > > "Proposal for a new VPN DBUS interface" - May 8th > > > > Dan > > > >> If anyone feels inclined to help with the effort (which is mainly bug > >> fixing at this point), feel free to contact me. > >> > >> Steve. > Does this also mean that it will possible to use VPN even if the network > connection is not managed through NM but is set to static as described > here: > https://bugs.launchpad.net/ubuntu/+source/network-manager/+bug/115750 - or > is that only Ubuntu thing? > Tomas > _______________________________________________ > NetworkManager-list mailing list > NetworkManager-list@gnome.org > http://mail.gnome.org/mailman/listinfo/networkmanager-list > _______________________________________________ NetworkManager-list mailing list NetworkManager-list@gnome.org http://mail.gnome.org/mailman/listinfo/networkmanager-list
