On Fri, 2008-08-01 at 17:46 -0400, Nathaniel McCallum wrote: > So I upgraded to the stuff in F9 updates-testing and it broke > NM-OpenVPN. Particularly, the problem is routing. > > Routing before the upgrade: > $ route -n | grep tun > 10.254.0.1 10.254.0.9 255.255.255.255 UGH 0 0 > 0 tun0 > 10.254.0.9 0.0.0.0 255.255.255.255 UH 0 0 > 0 tun0 > > Routing after the upgrade: > $ route -n | grep tun > 10.254.0.1 10.254.0.9 255.255.255.255 UGH 0 0 > 0 tun0 > 10.254.0.0 0.0.0.0 255.255.255.0 U 0 0 > 0 tun0
What ends up breaking here? Do you just want traffic to 10.254.0.9 to go out over tun0 and everything else (including all other 10.254.0.x/24) to still go out over the local network? Also, what does the openvpn server config look like? The only difference between the two dumps above should be that in the second, all 10.254.0.0/24 traffic goes out over the tunnel now. Dan > Interface info: > $ ifconfig tun0 > tun0 Link encap:UNSPEC HWaddr > 00-00-00-00-00-00-00-00-00-00-00-00-00-00-00-00 > inet addr:10.254.0.10 P-t-P:10.254.0.9 Mask:255.255.255.0 > UP POINTOPOINT RUNNING NOARP MULTICAST MTU:1500 Metric:1 > RX packets:19 errors:0 dropped:0 overruns:0 frame:0 > TX packets:171 errors:0 dropped:0 overruns:0 carrier:0 > collisions:0 txqueuelen:100 > RX bytes:2643 (2.5 KiB) TX bytes:11045 (10.7 KiB) > > > > _______________________________________________ > NetworkManager-list mailing list > NetworkManager-list@gnome.org > http://mail.gnome.org/mailman/listinfo/networkmanager-list _______________________________________________ NetworkManager-list mailing list NetworkManager-list@gnome.org http://mail.gnome.org/mailman/listinfo/networkmanager-list
