Thanks for the info ... I just have one more question, see inline. On Thu, Oct 2, 2008 at 3:18 PM, Dan Williams <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> On Wed, 2008-10-01 at 19:14 -0400, Jose Aliste wrote: > > Hi all, > > > > I want to ask the question in the subject: > > Which AP is chosen when several are found for the same SSID? > > I ask this because I see three AP from mi wireless network at my > > office. Two of them are "802.11G" AP are the other one is only > > "802.11B" the signal for the slow one is better(it is nearer) and NM > > always connects to it. However, I would like to NM to connect to one > > of the others because even with less signal the connection is > > better( 33mb/s against the 11mb/s of a b connection!). > > At this moment, this is left up to the driver and the supplicant. The > supplicant will apparently choose the AP with the best signal strength > (since the scan results for the same SSID are sorted by signal > strength), but the driver can also choose to roam from AP to AP based on > other criteria. > > > > So, how can I tell NM to use the AP I need ? > > You can try to set the BSSID in the connection editor to lock it onto > one of the APs, but the driver has the discretion to ignore that and > roam to an AP it thinks is better. We don't yet have the facility to > lock to 802.11g at _any_ level of the stack, not just NetworkManager. > I am using NM 0.6 in Hardy and If I do as you or aaron said(keeping in th bssid only the address of the ap I want), but it does not work. However, If I go with manual config and I set the AP by using the wireless-ap option in the /etc/network/interfaces then everything works... Would I be more lucky in NM 0.7, I mean does NM 0.7 try to force the AP? Btw wpa_supplicant is used even if I am not using WPA? Thanks José > You could try setting the data rate, but that doesn't always do what you > want since you can only set it to one value, and the card would be > unable to rate-scale based on signal quality of the locked AP. > > In short, can't really be done, but this is only partly NM's fault. > There's a lot more work in the stack from drivers, to WEXT, to > wpa_supplicant to make sure this works the way you want it. > > Dan > > >
_______________________________________________ NetworkManager-list mailing list NetworkManager-list@gnome.org http://mail.gnome.org/mailman/listinfo/networkmanager-list