On Wed, 2009-06-03 at 08:40 -0500, Aaron Konstam wrote: > On Wed, 2009-06-03 at 08:21 -0500, Aaron Konstam wrote: > > On Wed, 2009-06-03 at 10:55 +0100, Marc Herbert wrote: > > > Aaron Konstam a écrit : > > > > On Mon, 2009-06-01 at 08:53 -0700, Daniel Fetchinson wrote: > > > > > > >> As I've said, but let me repeat it again, I do boot into run level 3. > > > >> After logging in I start X manually via startx. > > > > > > >>> We are having a giant miscommunication going on . What rl are you > > > >>> actually running at? > > > > > > >> No, there is no miscommunication, simply you just have to believe that > > > >> it is possible to boot in runlevel 3 and then it is possible to start > > > >> X manually via startx :) > > > > > > > I believe it, if you will accept that running startx puts you in to rl5 > > > > not rl3. > > > > > > Huh? startx is changing the runlevel? That is some news. > > This is a semantic argument. rl3 does not support X, rl5 does. I have > > never actually checked this but I would be amazed if when one runs > > startx the system does not switch to rl5. > > > > But I guess I will have to try it or depend on the testimony of someone > > who runs startx. I have been amazed before. > Well it is always good to be amazed at least once a day. I tried it. > startx does not cause rl5 to be reported by runlevel. Howver, at least > on my machine NM does not run the way it should.
Does startx spawn the applet? I'm pretty sure it should, since I think startx just starts up the normal r5 session but of course doesn't switch to r5. It also depends on what levels you've got NM set to start at: chkconfig --list | grep NetworkManager should tell you that. Dan _______________________________________________ NetworkManager-list mailing list NetworkManager-list@gnome.org http://mail.gnome.org/mailman/listinfo/networkmanager-list