On Fri, 2009-06-05 at 14:35 -0400, Dan Williams wrote: > It really shouldn't; I was being conservative there. The 'scanning' > property (assuming you have that supplicant patch which is now upstream > and also available at [1]) should reflect the scanning state internally > in the supplicant.
OK, makes sense, and if it doesn't then we should fix the supplicant. So I don't think there is a need for any patches here. Daniel _______________________________________________ NetworkManager-list mailing list NetworkManager-list@gnome.org http://mail.gnome.org/mailman/listinfo/networkmanager-list