On Fri, Jul 31, 2009 at 5:19 PM, Hadmut Danisch <had...@danisch.de> wrote:

> Alexander Sack wrote:
> > Pleaes contribute proactively and confirm that removing stuff from
> > there fixes the keyfile for you. Otherwise you waste everyones time
> > here.
> >
>
> Removing stuff from /etc/network/interfaces was the first step
> I tried for debugging.
>
> Currently my /e/n/i contains
>
> auto lo eth0
>
> iface lo inet loopback
>    ...
>
> iface eth0 inet static
>    ...
>
> and nothing else. The problems I have with network-manager on that
> machine are related to an GSM device (UMTS mobile phone connected
> through USB cable).  I also tried removing anything but the lo
> configuration,
> and it did not fix the problem.
>
>   1. I do not see how an /e/n/i containing configs for lo and eth0
>      could cause nm's trouble with gsm or other connections.
>   2. Even if so, nm should behave similar for configurations put in the
>      user's individual desktop settings or in the system wide settings.
>      The problem occurs with the system wide setting only.
>   3. Even if my configuration was wrong in any way and would make using
>      GSM connections unusable with nm, then nm should not offer me the
>      configuration assistant for the mobile phone at login time if a
>      system wide configuration already exists.
>   4. I, btw., cannot understand why killing nm-system-settings causes
>      nm to take down eth0 even if eth0 is not managed by nm but by
>      /e/n/i. How can nm be configured to deal with particular types of
>      interfaces only (e.g. GSM, VPN) and keep it's fingers from eth0?
>
> This boils down to the problem, that the nm-system-settings manager for
> whatever reason does not find its configuration.
>
> Even if my /e/n/i was wrong or incompatible, nm should behave
> consistantly and issue any usefull warning or debugging messages.
>
>
>
>
> > It is ok to express your opinion, but it does not belong in this
> > thread for sure.
> >
> What would be the appropriate thread to express that nm suffers from
> severe mis-design?
>
>
> I do not believe that it was a good idea to use nm as a standard
> software tool in ubuntu.

This is not a Ubuntu mailing-list. Go troll here
http://ubuntuforums.org/showthread.php?t=527365.

>
> regards
> Hadmut
>
>
>
>
>
> _______________________________________________
> NetworkManager-list mailing list
> NetworkManager-list@gnome.org
> http://mail.gnome.org/mailman/listinfo/networkmanager-list
>
_______________________________________________
NetworkManager-list mailing list
NetworkManager-list@gnome.org
http://mail.gnome.org/mailman/listinfo/networkmanager-list

Reply via email to